You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/10/14 19:16:34 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-6594) deprecate the one action only
APIs for schema editing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14171219#comment-14171219 ]
Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-6594 at 10/14/14 5:15 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
There are already many end points in schema API which are not editable . It is OK in REST to have some end points which are GET only and other 'verbs' are disabled .
I would even go as far to say that the individual end points were made necessary because of the write path requirements. Users would not find it a lot difficult to extract the required data from the whole schema also.
It may be more weird to have multiple ways to perform the exact same operation. It will put a heavy burden on future developers to ensure that the same functionality is implemented in both end points and they are also consistent.
I can't imagine what value add will a user get in doing the following
{code}
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/schema/fields -X POST -H 'Content-type:application/json' --data-binary '
[
{
"name":"department",
"type":"string",
"docValues":"true",
"default":"no department",
"copyFields": [ "catchall" ]
}
]'
{code}
instead of
{code}
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/schema -X POST -H 'Content-type:application/json' --data-binary '
{
"add-field" : {
"name":"department",
"type":"string",
"docValues":"true",
"default":"no department",
"copyFields": [ "catchall" ]
}
}
{code}
I would say this is more code (25 java files) to maintain for the future developers and more APIs to support.
was (Author: noble.paul):
There are already many end points in schema API which are not editable . It is OK in REST to have some end points which are GET only and other 'verbs' are disabled .
It may be more weird to have multiple ways to perform the exact same operation. It will put a heavy burden on future developers to ensure that the same functionality is implemented in both end points and they are also consistent.
I can't imagine what value add will a user get in doing the following
{code}
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/schema/fields -X POST -H 'Content-type:application/json' --data-binary '
[
{
"name":"department",
"type":"string",
"docValues":"true",
"default":"no department",
"copyFields": [ "catchall" ]
}
]'
{code}
instead of
{code}
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/schema -X POST -H 'Content-type:application/json' --data-binary '
{
"add-field" : {
"name":"department",
"type":"string",
"docValues":"true",
"default":"no department",
"copyFields": [ "catchall" ]
}
}
{code}
I would say this is more code (25 java files) to maintain for the future developers and more APIs to support.
> deprecate the one action only APIs for schema editing
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6594
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6594
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Noble Paul
>
> with SOLR-6476 done and committed , we have more than one way of writing to schema . Having two different ways of doing the same thing is counter productive .
> I would like to mark them as deprecated and the calls to those APIs will succeed but will give a deprecation message in the output. The read APIs would continue to be the same , though .
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org