HEAD is going to be...?

[Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>]

Is the current HEAD going to be 1.0.1 or 1.1 or 2.0?

I seem to remember Alan volunteering to be release manager for the
next release... Which one is that going to be?

I'm trying to think about what features ought to go where, in terms of
HEAD, the 1.0 branch, etc.

I think I'd prefer that 1.0.1 be bug fixes only and go into the 1.0
branch, and that HEAD get minor new features and become 1.1 (in, say,
a 3-month time frame), and we target major new features like XBean or
EJB 3 or anything else like that for a subsequent 2.0 (in, say, a 6
month time frame).  I'd lean toward the new CORBA not going into 1.1,
since I don't think it'll be ready in time, but I'd be happy to be
corrected.  :)

Thanks,
    Aaron

Re: HEAD is going to be...?

[Jacek Laskowski <el...@gmail.com>]

2005/12/31, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>:
> Is the current HEAD going to be 1.0.1 or 1.1 or 2.0?

Hi Aaron,

I think it might become 1.1 and if a bug fix comes in it would make it 1.0.1.

> I'm trying to think about what features ought to go where, in terms of
> HEAD, the 1.0 branch, etc.
>
> I think I'd prefer that 1.0.1 be bug fixes only and go into the 1.0
> branch, and that HEAD get minor new features and become 1.1 (in, say,
> a 3-month time frame), and we target major new features like XBean or
> EJB 3 or anything else like that for a subsequent 2.0 (in, say, a 6
> month time frame).  I'd lean toward the new CORBA not going into 1.1,
> since I don't think it'll be ready in time, but I'd be happy to be
> corrected.  :)

Yes, that would be exactly what I wish to see happening. The time
showed that it's very hard to manage the 3-months period, but it's
worth to try again. I'm not sure about the 6-months period when
Geronimo 2.0 would eventually show up. I think it's too short, and
before it happens two or three mid-releases (1.1, 1.2 and 1.3) would
probably be well-received by our community. I think these mid-releases
seem to be (perceived as) less painful and would allow features be
available sooner.

>     Aaron

Jacek

Re: HEAD is going to be...?

[Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>]

Typically it's for all releases, until someone else volunteers for a
specific version(s). for example we have two different people for
Axis1 and Axis2. So either way is ok.

-- dims

On 1/1/06, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
> On 1/1/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > trunk will be 1.1
> > branches/1.0 will be 1.0.1
>
> Sounds good.  Which one are you the release manager for?  Or both?
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/

Re: HEAD is going to be...?

[Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>]

On 1/1/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> trunk will be 1.1
> branches/1.0 will be 1.0.1

Sounds good.  Which one are you the release manager for?  Or both?

Thanks,
    Aaron

Re: HEAD is going to be...?

["Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>]

On 12/30/2005 4:41 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

>Is the current HEAD going to be 1.0.1 or 1.1 or 2.0?
>  
>
trunk will be 1.1
branches/1.0 will be 1.0.1



Regards,
Alan