You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/03/11 19:50:46 UTC
[GitHub] [accumulo] EdColeman opened a new issue #1561: Explore alternatives
for metrics.
EdColeman opened a new issue #1561: Explore alternatives for metrics.
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1561
The [micrometer metrics facade](https://micrometer.io/) may be an alternative to hadoop metrics2 that might be able to simplify / enhance our current metrics. This issue is to document what changes this would require.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [accumulo] ctubbsii commented on issue #1561: Explore alternatives
for metrics.
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ctubbsii commented on issue #1561: Explore alternatives for metrics.
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1561#issuecomment-597885619
Since this is kind of open-ended exploration, I think we can leave off the 2.1.0 tag, since exploration isn't necessarily tied to any specific target version.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [accumulo] EdColeman commented on issue #1561: Explore alternatives
for metrics.
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
EdColeman commented on issue #1561: Explore alternatives for metrics.
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1561#issuecomment-597896820
Okay with removing the tag - my intention was to signal that this was something that could go into 2.1. Being is still speculation, but if it would work out / be accepted, then it could be tagged with a version then.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services