You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com> on 2009/06/04 17:07:39 UTC
[vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
release culminating in r781724.
I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
available at:
http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
opening up the code for general development once again.
This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
have been cast (if earlier).
If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
available on the download page, as usual.
Regards,
Mark.
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
Posted by Pavel Pervov <pm...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Mark Hindess<ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone
10
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Mark Hindess wrote:
> In message <4A...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>> The first thing I tried after successfully building from source, was
>> java -version.
>>
>> In M9 it prints out:
>> c:\harmony-jdk-761593\jre\bin>java -version
>> Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2008 The Apache Software
>> Foundation or its licensors, as applicable.
>> java version "1.5.0"
>> pre-alpha : not complete or compatible
>> svn = r761593, (Apr 3 2009), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, release build
>> http://harmony.apache.org
>>
>> but in the M10 candidate it only prints:
>> c:\apache-harmony-src-r781724\target\hdk\jdk\jre\bin>java -version
>> java version "1.5.0"
>> Apache Harmony (1.5.0)
>> DRLVM (11.2.0)
>>
>> which is a regression IMHO, and so I'm inclined to vote -1 on this
>> release candidate. Besides the all important copyright statement
>> missing, when we gather JIRAs we ask people to tell us the version they
>> are running and without the specific platform/revision it is useless.
>
> I agree.
>
>> The regression seems to have come in as r763589.
>
> Oliver changed this but he's not around so I'd like to revert this
> commit[0]. Any other committers approve this?
I agree with reverting the change.
Regards,
Tim
> [0] It is a good idea though and I'll re-commit it after M10 and think
> about what is required to fix it properly.
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <4A...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> The first thing I tried after successfully building from source, was
> java -version.
>
> In M9 it prints out:
> c:\harmony-jdk-761593\jre\bin>java -version
> Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2008 The Apache Software
> Foundation or its licensors, as applicable.
> java version "1.5.0"
> pre-alpha : not complete or compatible
> svn = r761593, (Apr 3 2009), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, release build
> http://harmony.apache.org
>
> but in the M10 candidate it only prints:
> c:\apache-harmony-src-r781724\target\hdk\jdk\jre\bin>java -version
> java version "1.5.0"
> Apache Harmony (1.5.0)
> DRLVM (11.2.0)
>
> which is a regression IMHO, and so I'm inclined to vote -1 on this
> release candidate. Besides the all important copyright statement
> missing, when we gather JIRAs we ask people to tell us the version they
> are running and without the specific platform/revision it is useless.
I agree.
> The regression seems to have come in as r763589.
Oliver changed this but he's not around so I'd like to revert this
commit[0]. Any other committers approve this?
Regards,
Mark.
[0] It is a good idea though and I'll re-commit it after M10 and think
about what is required to fix it properly.
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone
10
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
The first thing I tried after successfully building from source, was
java -version.
In M9 it prints out:
c:\harmony-jdk-761593\jre\bin>java -version
Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2008 The Apache Software
Foundation or its licensors, as applicable.
java version "1.5.0"
pre-alpha : not complete or compatible
svn = r761593, (Apr 3 2009), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, release build
http://harmony.apache.org
but in the M10 candidate it only prints:
c:\apache-harmony-src-r781724\target\hdk\jdk\jre\bin>java -version
java version "1.5.0"
Apache Harmony (1.5.0)
DRLVM (11.2.0)
which is a regression IMHO, and so I'm inclined to vote -1 on this
release candidate. Besides the all important copyright statement
missing, when we gather JIRAs we ask people to tell us the version they
are running and without the specific platform/revision it is useless.
The regression seems to have come in as r763589.
Regards,
Tim
Mark Hindess wrote:
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
Posted by "Jimmy,Jing Lv" <fi...@gmail.com>.
+1
2009/6/4 Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>
>
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehindessm/m10/>
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
--
Best Regards!
Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone
10
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Mark Hindess wrote:
> In message <4A...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>> Do you have a windows source archive available for release too?
>> We would normally do both simultaneously.
>
> I've created one and placed it at the same url. Should we restart
> the vote? Does anyone object if we don't?
I only fell over it because I went to use the .tar.gz on my windows
machine, and it failed to create the empty directory under
nio/src/main/java/windows which in turn caused a build break.
I'll download the ZIP and test with that on windows, and test the tar on
Linux.
Regards,
Tim
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <4A...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> Do you have a windows source archive available for release too?
> We would normally do both simultaneously.
I've created one and placed it at the same url. Should we restart
the vote? Does anyone object if we don't?
Regards,
Mark.
> Mark Hindess wrote:
> > We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> > addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> > further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> > release culminating in r781724.
> >
> > I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> > available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
> >
> > Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> > opening up the code for general development once again.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> > have been cast (if earlier).
> >
> > If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> > available on the download page, as usual.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark.
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone
10
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Do you have a windows source archive available for release too?
We would normally do both simultaneously.
Regards,
Tim
Mark Hindess wrote:
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
Posted by Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>.
+1
2009/6/4 Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>:
>
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
--
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
+1 for waiting
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Tim Ellison<t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please can I have a couple of days to look at it? I just got off the
> plane and need to find a couple of hours to review properly. If you
> don't hear from my by Monday PM then just go ahead with the votes you've
> got.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> Mark Hindess wrote:
>> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
>> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
>> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
>> release culminating in r781724.
>>
>> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
>> available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>>
>> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
>> opening up the code for general development once again.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
>> have been cast (if earlier).
>>
>> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
>> available on the download page, as usual.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>>
>
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://www.telecom-express.ru/
http://harmony.apache.org/
http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <4A...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> Please can I have a couple of days to look at it? I just got off the
> plane and need to find a couple of hours to review properly. If you
> don't hear from my by Monday PM then just go ahead with the votes you've
> got.
Sure. (I've had a busier weekend than I was expecting so I could use a
little more time too.)
-Mark.
> Mark Hindess wrote:
> > We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> > addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> > further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> > release culminating in r781724.
> >
> > I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> > available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
> >
> > Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> > opening up the code for general development once again.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> > have been cast (if earlier).
> >
> > If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> > available on the download page, as usual.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark.
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone
10
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Please can I have a couple of days to look at it? I just got off the
plane and need to find a couple of hours to review properly. If you
don't hear from my by Monday PM then just go ahead with the votes you've
got.
Regards,
Tim
Mark Hindess wrote:
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone
10
Posted by Regis <xu...@gmail.com>.
Mark Hindess wrote:
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
+1
--
Best Regards,
Regis.
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone
10
Posted by Oliver Deakin <ol...@googlemail.com>.
+1
Regards,
Oliver
Mark Hindess wrote:
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
>
--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source tar of r781724 as Milestone 10
Posted by Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
2009/6/4 Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>:
>
> We have completed our stability testing cycle against r780017 and
> addressed all the major issues and regressions found. There were three
> further non-functional (but required for M10) commits on top of that
> release culminating in r781724.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/m10/
>
> Please vote for declaring that source archive as milestone 10, and
> opening up the code for general development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>