You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-user@logging.apache.org by Fernanda Emanuella Silveira <fe...@inf.ufsc.br> on 2003/04/30 03:25:40 UTC
RE: Socket Appender Customization (fwd)
> I've post a doubt about SocketAppender on log4j-user list,
>as you can see below, but then I tested my application simulating an
>network link break (I pulled the network wire out) to see if the client
>(that was running in my machine) was blocked. For my surprise it didn't
>block..
> So, could anybody confirm if the affirmation "In particular, if the
>network link to the the server is down, the client will be blocked." is
>incorrect or I'm making a mass about it? :)
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Fernanda.
>
>
> FERNANDA EMANUELLA SILVEIRA
> fe@inf.ufsc.br
>
>"Não existe um caminho para a felicidade. A felicidade é o caminho."
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Fernanda Emanuella Silveira [mailto:fe@inf.ufsc.br]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 1:36 PM
>To: log4j-user@jakarta.apache.org
>Subject: Socket Appender Customization
>
>
>
>
> "In particular, if the network link to the the server is down, the
> client will be blocked. " (Class SocketAppender, from Log4j Javadoc at
>http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/net/SocketAppender.html)
>
> Is there a way, maybe customizing socket (setting time out), to avoid
> this situation?
> I'm working on a project which this situation (network link down) is
> common between client and server. So if the client is blocked every time
> it happens, it's very bad.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Fernanda.
>
> FERNANDA EMANUELLA SILVEIRA
> fe@inf.ufsc.br
>
>"Não existe um caminho para a felicidade. A felicidade é o caminho."
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
--
Ceki For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: Socket Appender Customization (fwd)
Posted by Clive Beavis <cb...@naniqsystems.com>.
I have not had any trouble with this at all. I found that typically once the
connection can be re-established just one message is lost then things get in
sync just fine. It would be nice if the one message that seems to cause
log4j to attempt the reconnection did not get lost as the connection is
established.
I am using multiple socket appenders from multiple applications to one
socket listener. I run test specifically to kill each end either via closing
down of the application or physically removing the wires. I have test up to
6 application all logging to the same port with no problems
Regards
Clive
650 372 5204 (office)
650 372 5201 (fax)
650 464 2604 (cell)
Naniq Systems LLC.
1810 Gateway Dr #110
San Mateo, CA 94404
http://www.naniqsystems.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Fernanda Emanuella Silveira [mailto:fe@inf.ufsc.br]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 6:26 PM
To: log4j-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: Socket Appender Customization (fwd)
> I've post a doubt about SocketAppender on log4j-user list,
>as you can see below, but then I tested my application simulating an
>network link break (I pulled the network wire out) to see if the client
>(that was running in my machine) was blocked. For my surprise it didn't
>block..
> So, could anybody confirm if the affirmation "In particular, if the
>network link to the the server is down, the client will be blocked." is
>incorrect or I'm making a mass about it? :)
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Fernanda.
>
>
> FERNANDA EMANUELLA SILVEIRA
> fe@inf.ufsc.br
>
>"Não existe um caminho para a felicidade. A felicidade é o caminho."
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Fernanda Emanuella Silveira [mailto:fe@inf.ufsc.br]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 1:36 PM
>To: log4j-user@jakarta.apache.org
>Subject: Socket Appender Customization
>
>
>
>
> "In particular, if the network link to the the server is down, the
> client will be blocked. " (Class SocketAppender, from Log4j Javadoc at
>http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/net/SocketAppende
r.html)
>
> Is there a way, maybe customizing socket (setting time out), to avoid
> this situation?
> I'm working on a project which this situation (network link down) is
> common between client and server. So if the client is blocked every time
> it happens, it's very bad.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Fernanda.
>
> FERNANDA EMANUELLA SILVEIRA
> fe@inf.ufsc.br
>
>"Não existe um caminho para a felicidade. A felicidade é o caminho."
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
--
Ceki For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org