You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org> on 2006/04/14 01:00:52 UTC
Struts Faces - what to do?
Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to
continue to support the struts-faces project? If so, can someone
please fix the faces example (1 and 2) apps?
--
James Mitchell
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Struts Faces - what to do?
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 4/13/06, James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, I believe things have settled down. Although I'm still working
> changes in the struts-scripting webapp.
>
> The error I was getting when deploying the faces-example1 app was:
> javax.faces.FacesException: Undefined component type
> org.apache.struts.faces.Html
Sounds like a jar file is missing from the webapp ... not all that
surprising giving all the changes going on. I'll take a look.
I was under the assumption that the struts-faces library only buys
> someone partial compatibility. And what they get was only jsf-1.0
> compatible anyway, but I will be happy to be corrected.
It buys you either JSF 1.0 or 1.1 or 1.2 ... but, more importantly, it buys
you the ability to use the UI components part of JSF even if you don't want
to use the controller part. For example, it has full integration with
Commons Validator and Tiles, but uses JSF component tags instead of Struts
HTML tags.
--
> James Mitchell
Craig
Re: Struts Faces - what to do?
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
Yes, I believe things have settled down. Although I'm still working
changes in the struts-scripting webapp.
The error I was getting when deploying the faces-example1 app was:
javax.faces.FacesException: Undefined component type
org.apache.struts.faces.Html
I was under the assumption that the struts-faces library only buys
someone partial compatibility. And what they get was only jsf-1.0
compatible anyway, but I will be happy to be corrected.
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 14, 2006, at 12:14 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> On 4/13/06, James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to
>> continue to support the struts-faces project?
>
>
> We should. There will be people who want to have a few JSF
> components on a
> few pages (or they want to migrate) -- and using this library is
> the right
> strategy for them. Don was also talking about porting this to
> action2,
> which I also support.
>
> If so, can someone
>> please fix the faces example (1 and 2) apps?
>
>
> Has the source organization and the build scripts settled down
> now? If so,
> I can devote some time to this ... but not until the end of next
> week. One
> more long trip first (St. Petersburg, Russia).
>
> --
>> James Mitchell
>
>
> Craig
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Struts Faces - what to do?
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 4/13/06, James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to
> continue to support the struts-faces project?
We should. There will be people who want to have a few JSF components on a
few pages (or they want to migrate) -- and using this library is the right
strategy for them. Don was also talking about porting this to action2,
which I also support.
If so, can someone
> please fix the faces example (1 and 2) apps?
Has the source organization and the build scripts settled down now? If so,
I can devote some time to this ... but not until the end of next week. One
more long trip first (St. Petersburg, Russia).
--
> James Mitchell
Craig
Re: Struts Faces - what to do?
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 4/14/06, Dakota Jack <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Isn't the rule that this should have [faces] or something like that in the
> subject matter?
It is a convention, not a rule. And it is more for the user list than the
dev list -- people subscribed here are presumed to have a clue :-).
Craig
Re: Struts Faces - what to do?
Posted by Dakota Jack <da...@gmail.com>.
Isn't the rule that this should have [faces] or something like that in the
subject matter?
On 4/13/06, James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to
> continue to support the struts-faces project? If so, can someone
> please fix the faces example (1 and 2) apps?
>
> --
> James Mitchell
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~