You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2011/01/25 17:08:45 UTC
fixing a spelling error
Hi Tommaso,
I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization between
sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom names the
artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is intended
for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that at some
point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular projects...)
-Marshall
Re: fixing a spelling error
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
That's right for me :-)
I'm going to apply such a change and also align the directory names of the
modules to the related artifactIds.
Tommaso
2011/1/27 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> how about addons-osgi-runtime ?
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 1/27/2011 9:58 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> > Hi Marshall,
> > no problem for me, you can certainly do it; I was just wondering which
> name
> > could be the best to change the sandbox-osgi-runtime to, so I waited for
> > some feedback first ;-) Do you have any preference?
> > Cheers,
> > Tommaso
> >
> > 2011/1/27 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> >
> >> Tommaso - Can I do this naming change, or do you want to handle it?
> >> -Marshall
> >>
> >> On 1/25/2011 5:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> >>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> >>>
> >>>> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Marshall,
> >>>>> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about
> >>>> being
> >>>>> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi
> >> artifact
> >>>>> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be
> >> called
> >>>>> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
> >>>> Ok, sounds right.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the
> >>>> containing
> >>>> folder name
> >>>> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the
> artifact
> >>>> name;
> >>>> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
> >>>> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called,
> e.g.,
> >>>> Lucas,
> >>>> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under
> the
> >>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
> >>>>
> >>>> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime,
> >> to
> >>>> use
> >>>> those names (which will now match the artifact names).
> >>>>
> >>>> So for example:
> >>>>
> >>>> This would change the following:
> >>>>
> >>>> <modules>
> >>>> <module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
> >>>> <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
> >>>> ...
> >>>> <module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi
> >>>> </modules>
> >>>>
> >>>> Does this sound right? Or have I missed something?
> >>>>
> >>> Yep Marshall that sounds good :)
> >>> Tommaso
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -Marshall
> >>>>
> >>>>> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part,
> >> maybe
> >>>>> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Tommaso
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Tommaso,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization
> >>>> between
> >>>>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the
> pom
> >>>>>> names the
> >>>>>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
> >>>>>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
> >>>>>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
> >>>>>> intended
> >>>>>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking
> that
> >> at
> >>>>>> some
> >>>>>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular
> >>>> projects...)
> >>>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>>
>
Re: fixing a spelling error
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
how about addons-osgi-runtime ?
-Marshall
On 1/27/2011 9:58 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
> no problem for me, you can certainly do it; I was just wondering which name
> could be the best to change the sandbox-osgi-runtime to, so I waited for
> some feedback first ;-) Do you have any preference?
> Cheers,
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/1/27 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
>
>> Tommaso - Can I do this naming change, or do you want to handle it?
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 1/25/2011 5:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
>>>
>>>> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>>>>> Hi Marshall,
>>>>> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about
>>>> being
>>>>> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi
>> artifact
>>>>> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be
>> called
>>>>> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
>>>> Ok, sounds right.
>>>>
>>>> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the
>>>> containing
>>>> folder name
>>>> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact
>>>> name;
>>>> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
>>>> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g.,
>>>> Lucas,
>>>> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the
>>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
>>>>
>>>> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime,
>> to
>>>> use
>>>> those names (which will now match the artifact names).
>>>>
>>>> So for example:
>>>>
>>>> This would change the following:
>>>>
>>>> <modules>
>>>> <module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
>>>> <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
>>>> ...
>>>> <module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi
>>>> </modules>
>>>>
>>>> Does this sound right? Or have I missed something?
>>>>
>>> Yep Marshall that sounds good :)
>>> Tommaso
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>>> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part,
>> maybe
>>>>> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Tommaso
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Tommaso,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization
>>>> between
>>>>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
>>>>>> names the
>>>>>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
>>>>>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
>>>>>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
>>>>>> intended
>>>>>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that
>> at
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular
>>>> projects...)
>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>
Re: fixing a spelling error
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Marshall,
no problem for me, you can certainly do it; I was just wondering which name
could be the best to change the sandbox-osgi-runtime to, so I waited for
some feedback first ;-) Do you have any preference?
Cheers,
Tommaso
2011/1/27 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> Tommaso - Can I do this naming change, or do you want to handle it?
> -Marshall
>
> On 1/25/2011 5:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> > 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> >
> >>
> >> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> >>> Hi Marshall,
> >>> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about
> >> being
> >>> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi
> artifact
> >>> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be
> called
> >>> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
> >> Ok, sounds right.
> >>
> >> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the
> >> containing
> >> folder name
> >> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact
> >> name;
> >> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
> >> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g.,
> >> Lucas,
> >> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the
> >> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
> >>
> >> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime,
> to
> >> use
> >> those names (which will now match the artifact names).
> >>
> >> So for example:
> >>
> >> This would change the following:
> >>
> >> <modules>
> >> <module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
> >> <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
> >> ...
> >> <module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi
> >> </modules>
> >>
> >> Does this sound right? Or have I missed something?
> >>
> > Yep Marshall that sounds good :)
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> >> -Marshall
> >>
> >>> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part,
> maybe
> >>> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Tommaso
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Tommaso,
> >>>>
> >>>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization
> >> between
> >>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
> >>>> names the
> >>>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
> >>>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
> >>>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
> >>>> intended
> >>>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that
> at
> >>>> some
> >>>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular
> >> projects...)
> >>>> -Marshall
> >>>>
>
Re: fixing a spelling error
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Tommaso - Can I do this naming change, or do you want to handle it?
-Marshall
On 1/25/2011 5:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
>
>>
>> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>>> Hi Marshall,
>>> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about
>> being
>>> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi artifact
>>> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be called
>>> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
>> Ok, sounds right.
>>
>> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the
>> containing
>> folder name
>> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact
>> name;
>> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
>> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g.,
>> Lucas,
>> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the
>> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
>>
>> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime, to
>> use
>> those names (which will now match the artifact names).
>>
>> So for example:
>>
>> This would change the following:
>>
>> <modules>
>> <module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
>> <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
>> ...
>> <module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi
>> </modules>
>>
>> Does this sound right? Or have I missed something?
>>
> Yep Marshall that sounds good :)
> Tommaso
>
>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, maybe
>>> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tommaso
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
>>>
>>>> Hi Tommaso,
>>>>
>>>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization
>> between
>>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
>>>> names the
>>>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
>>>>
>>>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
>>>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
>>>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
>>>> intended
>>>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that at
>>>> some
>>>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular
>> projects...)
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
Re: fixing a spelling error
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
>
>
> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> > Hi Marshall,
> > the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about
> being
> > aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi artifact
> > (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be called
> > $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
>
> Ok, sounds right.
>
> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the
> containing
> folder name
> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact
> name;
> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g.,
> Lucas,
> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the
> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
>
> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime, to
> use
> those names (which will now match the artifact names).
>
> So for example:
>
> This would change the following:
>
> <modules>
> <module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
> <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
> ...
> <module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi
> </modules>
>
> Does this sound right? Or have I missed something?
>
Yep Marshall that sounds good :)
Tommaso
>
> -Marshall
>
> > Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, maybe
> > replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> > 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> >
> >> Hi Tommaso,
> >>
> >> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization
> between
> >> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
> >> names the
> >> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
> >>
> >> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
> >> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
> >> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
> >> intended
> >> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that at
> >> some
> >> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular
> projects...)
> >>
> >> -Marshall
> >>
>
Re: fixing a spelling error
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about being
> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi artifact
> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be called
> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
Ok, sounds right.
I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the containing
folder name
(in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact name;
this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g., Lucas,
and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the
sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime, to use
those names (which will now match the artifact names).
So for example:
This would change the following:
<modules>
<module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
<module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
...
<module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi
</modules>
Does this sound right? Or have I missed something?
-Marshall
> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, maybe
> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
>
> Cheers,
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
>
>> Hi Tommaso,
>>
>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization between
>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
>> names the
>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
>>
>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
>> intended
>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that at
>> some
>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular projects...)
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
Re: fixing a spelling error
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Marshall,
the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about being
aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi artifact
(created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be called
$ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, maybe
replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
Cheers,
Tommaso
2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization between
> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
> names the
> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
>
> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
> intended
> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that at
> some
> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular projects...)
>
> -Marshall
>