RegistrarBoundaries.pm a drop-in upgrade?

[John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>]

Folks:

For someone running an older SA but not in a position to upgrade the 
entire package, is RegistrarBoundaries.pm self-contained enough and has 
its API been stable enough that it would be a drop-in upgrade?

-- 
  John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
  jhardin@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Health Care _is_ a right - the government has no business keeping
   you from getting it. But forcing somebody else to pay for your
   health care at gunpoint (i.e. through taxation) is _not_ a right.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  9 days until the 227th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution

Re: RegistrarBoundaries.pm a drop-in upgrade?

[Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>]

On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 17:40 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> Folks:
> 
> For someone running an older SA but not in a position to upgrade the 
> entire package, is RegistrarBoundaries.pm self-contained enough and has 
> its API been stable enough that it would be a drop-in upgrade?

Probably.

But see Amir Caspi's followup to exactly that question on the users@
list: Works for him based on brief testing. Also see my sub-thread of
possibly moving VALID_TLDS and its RE friend's definition to config.


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}