You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Vladimir Sitnikov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/08/07 09:29:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-2450) RexSimplify: reorder predicates to a canonical form as a part of RexSimplify

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vladimir Sitnikov updated CALCITE-2450:
---------------------------------------
    Summary: RexSimplify: reorder predicates to a canonical form as a part of RexSimplify  (was: Reorder predicates to a canonical form as a part of RexSimplify)

> RexSimplify: reorder predicates to a canonical form as a part of RexSimplify
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2450
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2450
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.17.0
>            Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Major
>
> Certain optimizations are easier to perform when input expressions are in a canonical form.
> For instance: more duplicates can be found in AND/OR lists, case branches, etc.
> Note: this reordering is supposed to happen in RexSimplify only. In other words, RexBuilder would still produce "non-canonical" expressions.
> It is expected that {{RexSimplify}} might alter the expression, so if it converts {{5=x}} to {{x=5}} it should be just fine.
> The suggested rules are to be discussed, yet the following might be fine:
> 1) For AND, OR, IN: put "simpler" nodes first. The weight of a node could be either {{.toString().length()}} or a number of child nodes or something like that.
> The motivation is to simplify logic that handles "duplicate" entries. It won't have to consider "both alternatives" all over the place.
> 2) For comparison with literals put literal as the second argument
> 3) For binary comparison, put node with less weight to the left



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)