You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mime4j-dev@james.apache.org by Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com> on 2011/05/15 20:50:01 UTC
Handling comments in headers
Hi there (especialy Oleg),
does current trunk of mime4j handle comments in headers in the right
way ? For example when parsing Addresses.
For example:
From: <user-from (comment)@ (comment) domain.org>
Thanks,
Norman
Ps: Any plans in release trunk in the near future ?
Re: Handling comments in headers
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 08:07 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi Oleg,
>>
>> I think my question was not "correct". I'm looking for a method to
>> retrieve the comments which were find while parsing the header. Is
>> this possible ? At least with 0.6.1 it seems not to be possible.
>>
>> Bye,
>> Norman
>>
>
> Hi Norman
>
> I do not think this is possible at the moment. Comments in fields have
> always been treated as 'noise' and simply discarded.
>
> I have been working on low level tokenizer routines (RawFieldParser
> class) that could be used to build custom parsers for mime fields. One
> could use those routines to extract comments.
sounds good :-)
Robert
Re: Handling comments in headers
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com>.
Cool,
thanks for the response. I think I will open a jira ticket (feature
request) for this :)
Thanks,
Norman
2011/5/16 Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 08:07 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi Oleg,
>>
>> I think my question was not "correct". I'm looking for a method to
>> retrieve the comments which were find while parsing the header. Is
>> this possible ? At least with 0.6.1 it seems not to be possible.
>>
>> Bye,
>> Norman
>>
>
> Hi Norman
>
> I do not think this is possible at the moment. Comments in fields have
> always been treated as 'noise' and simply discarded.
>
> I have been working on low level tokenizer routines (RawFieldParser
> class) that could be used to build custom parsers for mime fields. One
> could use those routines to extract comments.
>
> Oleg
>
>>
>> 2011/5/15 Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>:
>> > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 20:50 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> >> Hi there (especialy Oleg),
>> >>
>> >> does current trunk of mime4j handle comments in headers in the right
>> >> way ? For example when parsing Addresses.
>> >>
>> >> For example:
>> >>
>> >> From: <user-from (comment)@ (comment) domain.org>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Norman
>> >>
>> >
>> > Norman
>> >
>> > All test cases still pass for me. Is there a particular reason to think
>> > that handling of comments in fields is broken?
>> >
>> >
>> >> Ps: Any plans in release trunk in the near future ?
>> >>
>> >
>> > My _personal_ plan is to have mime4j trunk in a releasable shape by mid
>> > July. There is still a few issues that need to be resolved, though.
>> >
>> > Oleg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
Re: Handling comments in headers
Posted by Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 08:07 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> I think my question was not "correct". I'm looking for a method to
> retrieve the comments which were find while parsing the header. Is
> this possible ? At least with 0.6.1 it seems not to be possible.
>
> Bye,
> Norman
>
Hi Norman
I do not think this is possible at the moment. Comments in fields have
always been treated as 'noise' and simply discarded.
I have been working on low level tokenizer routines (RawFieldParser
class) that could be used to build custom parsers for mime fields. One
could use those routines to extract comments.
Oleg
>
> 2011/5/15 Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>:
> > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 20:50 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
> >> Hi there (especialy Oleg),
> >>
> >> does current trunk of mime4j handle comments in headers in the right
> >> way ? For example when parsing Addresses.
> >>
> >> For example:
> >>
> >> From: <user-from (comment)@ (comment) domain.org>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Norman
> >>
> >
> > Norman
> >
> > All test cases still pass for me. Is there a particular reason to think
> > that handling of comments in fields is broken?
> >
> >
> >> Ps: Any plans in release trunk in the near future ?
> >>
> >
> > My _personal_ plan is to have mime4j trunk in a releasable shape by mid
> > July. There is still a few issues that need to be resolved, though.
> >
> > Oleg
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Handling comments in headers
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Oleg,
I think my question was not "correct". I'm looking for a method to
retrieve the comments which were find while parsing the header. Is
this possible ? At least with 0.6.1 it seems not to be possible.
Bye,
Norman
2011/5/15 Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>:
> On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 20:50 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi there (especialy Oleg),
>>
>> does current trunk of mime4j handle comments in headers in the right
>> way ? For example when parsing Addresses.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> From: <user-from (comment)@ (comment) domain.org>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Norman
>>
>
> Norman
>
> All test cases still pass for me. Is there a particular reason to think
> that handling of comments in fields is broken?
>
>
>> Ps: Any plans in release trunk in the near future ?
>>
>
> My _personal_ plan is to have mime4j trunk in a releasable shape by mid
> July. There is still a few issues that need to be resolved, though.
>
> Oleg
>
>
>
Re: Handling comments in headers
Posted by Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>.
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 20:50 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi there (especialy Oleg),
>
> does current trunk of mime4j handle comments in headers in the right
> way ? For example when parsing Addresses.
>
> For example:
>
> From: <user-from (comment)@ (comment) domain.org>
>
> Thanks,
> Norman
>
Norman
All test cases still pass for me. Is there a particular reason to think
that handling of comments in fields is broken?
> Ps: Any plans in release trunk in the near future ?
>
My _personal_ plan is to have mime4j trunk in a releasable shape by mid
July. There is still a few issues that need to be resolved, though.
Oleg