You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org> on 2006/11/01 13:43:52 UTC
Re: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?
On Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 11:24:35 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>> --On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni
>> <Gi...@Tomassoni.biz> wrote:
>>
>> > Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's "spam-friendly registar"
>> > plugin?
>>
>> Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for
>> "registrar" and it doesn't turn up.
> I haven't really offically "released" it yet.
> http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/SURBL_registrar/
FWIW I attemped to speed read John's code in about 2 seconds but
could not determine what ti had to do with SURBLs. Maybe John
can clarify?
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/
Re: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?
Posted by "John D. Hardin" <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > I haven't really offically "released" it yet.
>
> > http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/SURBL_registrar/
>
> FWIW I attemped to speed read John's code in about 2 seconds but
> could not determine what ti had to do with SURBLs. Maybe John
> can clarify?
The DNS server version was intended to be donated to SURBL for public
use. Unfortunately names have an inertia all their own.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are in a maze of twisty little protocols,
all written by Microsoft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 days until the campaign ads stop