You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org> on 2010/03/30 15:14:49 UTC
[Client-API] Moving client-api to shared
hello guys,
I have created a new LdapConnection class based on CoreSession
after Emmanuel's idea of having LdapConnection implementations based
on
CoreSession and a network layer. Now there is a factory
implementation for getting the appropriate connection (this code is
yet to be committed).
This new connection implementation can be used without
starting a LdapServer (ideal for tests inside core-integ)
As we want to use client-api in all the tests we are thinking
of moving the client-api to shared and rename shared.
wdyt?
P.S:- as this code reorg is specific to ApacheDS I haven't sent
this to api@d.a.o
Kiran Ayyagari
Re: [Client-API] Moving client-api to shared
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:
> As we want to use client-api in all the tests we are thinking
>
>> of moving the client-api to shared and rename shared.
>>>
>>>
>> This is a chicken and egg problem as they both depends on each other.
>> How are you going to rename shared ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> wdyt?
>>>
>>>
>> +1 for the move to shared
>> +0 for the rename of shared.
>>
>>
> IMO, shared *is* the API, client and server. If we are to rename it, I
> would suggest ldap-api. Shared means nothing anyway.
>
>
>
I agree with you 100% but we need to put shared into order if we are going
to really release this thing. There's a lot of package disorder and cleanup
required.
Regards,
--
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
Re: [Client-API] Moving client-api to shared
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
As we want to use client-api in all the tests we are thinking
>> of moving the client-api to shared and rename shared.
>>
> This is a chicken and egg problem as they both depends on each other.
> How are you going to rename shared ?
>
>
>
>> wdyt?
>>
> +1 for the move to shared
> +0 for the rename of shared.
>
IMO, shared *is* the API, client and server. If we are to rename it, I
would suggest ldap-api. Shared means nothing anyway.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
Re: [Client-API] Moving client-api to shared
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Ok, I see.
+1
On 30 mars 2010, at 16:07, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net> wrote:
>> Hi Kiran,
>>
>> On 30 mars 2010, at 15:14, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>>
>>> hello guys,
>>>
>>> I have created a new LdapConnection class based on CoreSession
>>> after Emmanuel's idea of having LdapConnection implementations based
>>> on
>>> CoreSession and a network layer. Now there is a factory
>>> implementation for getting the appropriate connection (this code is
>>> yet to be committed).
>>>
>>> This new connection implementation can be used without
>>> starting a LdapServer (ideal for tests inside core-integ)
>>>
>>> As we want to use client-api in all the tests we are thinking
>>> of moving the client-api to shared and rename shared.
>>
>> This is a chicken and egg problem as they both depends on each other.
>> How are you going to rename shared ?
> when I say moving(merging) client-api it is just 'ldap-client-api' not
> 'ldap-client-test' as tests require both shared and apacheds, sorry
> for any confusion caused by the earlier mail
>
> Kiran Ayyagari
Re: [Client-API] Moving client-api to shared
Posted by Kiran Ayyagari <ay...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net> wrote:
> Hi Kiran,
>
> On 30 mars 2010, at 15:14, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>
>> hello guys,
>>
>> I have created a new LdapConnection class based on CoreSession
>> after Emmanuel's idea of having LdapConnection implementations based
>> on
>> CoreSession and a network layer. Now there is a factory
>> implementation for getting the appropriate connection (this code is
>> yet to be committed).
>>
>> This new connection implementation can be used without
>> starting a LdapServer (ideal for tests inside core-integ)
>>
>> As we want to use client-api in all the tests we are thinking
>> of moving the client-api to shared and rename shared.
>
> This is a chicken and egg problem as they both depends on each other.
> How are you going to rename shared ?
when I say moving(merging) client-api it is just 'ldap-client-api' not
'ldap-client-test' as tests require both shared and apacheds, sorry
for any confusion caused by the earlier mail
Kiran Ayyagari
Re: [Client-API] Moving client-api to shared
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Hi Kiran,
On 30 mars 2010, at 15:14, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> hello guys,
>
> I have created a new LdapConnection class based on CoreSession
> after Emmanuel's idea of having LdapConnection implementations based
> on
> CoreSession and a network layer. Now there is a factory
> implementation for getting the appropriate connection (this code is
> yet to be committed).
>
> This new connection implementation can be used without
> starting a LdapServer (ideal for tests inside core-integ)
>
> As we want to use client-api in all the tests we are thinking
> of moving the client-api to shared and rename shared.
This is a chicken and egg problem as they both depends on each other.
How are you going to rename shared ?
> wdyt?
+1 for the move to shared
+0 for the rename of shared.
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud