You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Brandon Williams (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/22 21:13:28 UTC

[jira] Updated: (CASSANDRA-821) get_range_slice performance

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Brandon Williams updated CASSANDRA-821:
---------------------------------------

    Description: get_range_slice performance isn't that great.  CASSANDRA-799 helped in the case when the memtable isn't flushed, but overall the operations per second and latency is still pretty bad.  On a quad core node with a trivial amount of data I see around 130-150 ops per second with stress.py set to slice 100 keys at a time, and latency is 300-500ms.  (was: get_range_slice performance isn't that great.  CASSANDRA-799 helped in the case when the memtable isn't flushed, but overall the operations per second and latency is still pretty bad.  On a quad core node with a trivial amount of data I see around 130-150 ops per second with stress.py defaults, and latency is 300-500ms.)

> get_range_slice performance
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-821
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-821
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.7
>            Reporter: Brandon Williams
>            Priority: Minor
>
> get_range_slice performance isn't that great.  CASSANDRA-799 helped in the case when the memtable isn't flushed, but overall the operations per second and latency is still pretty bad.  On a quad core node with a trivial amount of data I see around 130-150 ops per second with stress.py set to slice 100 keys at a time, and latency is 300-500ms.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.