You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by John Vines <vi...@apache.org> on 2013/08/14 00:06:52 UTC

WAL issues in 1.5.0

I had a few instances of it before, but I was never able to concretely
create it in a non-virtual environment. Except today, I had a next clean
checkout of first 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT and then 1.5.0 from git, with a fresh hdfs
directory and I got the never ending stream of

"	java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException:
java.io.IOException: File
/accumulo/wal/127.0.0.1+9997/86c798b2-2de3-4860-ba84-645cc9d38cc7
could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1"


Normally when this happens, restarting the namenode is all I need to do to
fix it, but not this time. I'm willing to bet when I restart my computer it
will be fine. But, while this is happening, I'm seeing the number of files
in hdfs under the wal directory ever growing. I'm wondering if we have an
overly time sensitive contstraint or if there is a check we need to do
before giving up? I am seeing that error echoed in the namenode, so I'm not
quite sure.  This is on hadoop 1.0.4.

Re: WAL issues in 1.5.0

Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
CRAP, that was it. I wonder if that was the root of all of my VM issues
before...

Thanks Todd.


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Out of disk space? HDFS won't write to a volume if you don't have 5x the
> block size available.
>
> -Todd
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I had a few instances of it before, but I was never able to concretely
>> create it in a non-virtual environment. Except today, I had a next clean
>> checkout of first 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT and then 1.5.0 from git, with a fresh
>> hdfs
>> directory and I got the never ending stream of
>>
>> "       java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException:
>> java.io.IOException: File
>> /accumulo/wal/127.0.0.1+9997/86c798b2-2de3-4860-ba84-645cc9d38cc7
>> could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1"
>>
>>
>> Normally when this happens, restarting the namenode is all I need to do to
>> fix it, but not this time. I'm willing to bet when I restart my computer
>> it
>> will be fine. But, while this is happening, I'm seeing the number of files
>> in hdfs under the wal directory ever growing. I'm wondering if we have an
>> overly time sensitive contstraint or if there is a check we need to do
>> before giving up? I am seeing that error echoed in the namenode, so I'm
>> not
>> quite sure.  This is on hadoop 1.0.4.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

Re: WAL issues in 1.5.0

Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
Out of disk space? HDFS won't write to a volume if you don't have 5x the
block size available.

-Todd

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:

> I had a few instances of it before, but I was never able to concretely
> create it in a non-virtual environment. Except today, I had a next clean
> checkout of first 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT and then 1.5.0 from git, with a fresh hdfs
> directory and I got the never ending stream of
>
> "       java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException:
> java.io.IOException: File
> /accumulo/wal/127.0.0.1+9997/86c798b2-2de3-4860-ba84-645cc9d38cc7
> could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1"
>
>
> Normally when this happens, restarting the namenode is all I need to do to
> fix it, but not this time. I'm willing to bet when I restart my computer it
> will be fine. But, while this is happening, I'm seeing the number of files
> in hdfs under the wal directory ever growing. I'm wondering if we have an
> overly time sensitive contstraint or if there is a check we need to do
> before giving up? I am seeing that error echoed in the namenode, so I'm not
> quite sure.  This is on hadoop 1.0.4.
>



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera