You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@river.apache.org by Mike Morris <mi...@gmail.com> on 2008/10/08 15:10:14 UTC
[VOTE] AR2 Release?
Dan Creswell wrote:
> Be worth digging out the recent discussion around AR2, I believe several
> others are working towards getting this sorted. See the archives and
> specifically the thread titled "AR2".
I presume you are referring to the discussion initiated by Jim Hurley
around 11 Sept and the thread initiated by Dennis Reedy back in Jul/Aug.
I see therein a consensus (of only a few voices;-) to rather get a
release out rather than wait until all the Jira issues "officially
scheduled" for AR2 are closed. (I also note some discussion around
improving tests, but that's a bit out of my spheres of competence or
interest.) I didn't see anything where anyone said "OK let's do AR2",
hence sticking my head in the noose ;-)
So let me call for a vote: Do we feel we're ready to cut the next release
[ ] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
[ ] only after we've nailed all the issues currently scheduled for AR2
--
mike morris :: mikro2nd (at) gmail (dot) com
http://mikro2nd.net/
http://mikro2nd.net/blog/planb/
http://mikro2nd.net/blog/mike/
This email is [X]bloggable [ ]ask-first [ ]private
Re: [VOTE] AR2 Release?
Posted by Ronald J Mann <Ro...@Sun.COM>.
+1.
Dennis Reedy wrote:
>
> [x] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] AR2 Release?
Posted by Dennis Reedy <de...@gmail.com>.
[x] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
Re: [VOTE] AR2 Release?
Posted by Dan Rollo <da...@gmail.com>.
(non-binding)
[X] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
Dan Rollo
Mike Morris wrote:
> Dan Creswell wrote:
>
>> Be worth digging out the recent discussion around AR2, I believe several
>> others are working towards getting this sorted. See the archives and
>> specifically the thread titled "AR2".
>
> I presume you are referring to the discussion initiated by Jim Hurley
> around 11 Sept and the thread initiated by Dennis Reedy back in Jul/Aug.
>
> I see therein a consensus (of only a few voices;-) to rather get a
> release out rather than wait until all the Jira issues "officially
> scheduled" for AR2 are closed. (I also note some discussion around
> improving tests, but that's a bit out of my spheres of competence or
> interest.) I didn't see anything where anyone said "OK let's do AR2",
> hence sticking my head in the noose ;-)
>
> So let me call for a vote: Do we feel we're ready to cut the next release
>
> [ ] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
> [ ] only after we've nailed all the issues currently scheduled for AR2
>
Re: [VOTE] AR2 Release?
Posted by Sean Landis <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:55 PM, John McClain <Jo...@sun.com> wrote:
> Mike Morris wrote:
>>
>> So let me call for a vote: Do we feel we're ready to cut the next release
>>
>> [X] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
>> [ ] only after we've nailed all the issues currently scheduled for AR2
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] AR2 Release?
Posted by John McClain <Jo...@Sun.COM>.
Mike Morris wrote:
> So let me call for a vote: Do we feel we're ready to cut the next release
>
> [X] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
> [ ] only after we've nailed all the issues currently scheduled for AR2
>
Re: [VOTE] AR2 Release?
Posted by Jim Waldo <Ji...@sun.com>.
I vote for sooner rather than more complete
Jim Waldo
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
> Dan Creswell wrote:
>
>> Be worth digging out the recent discussion around AR2, I believe
>> several
>> others are working towards getting this sorted. See the archives and
>> specifically the thread titled "AR2".
>
> I presume you are referring to the discussion initiated by Jim
> Hurley around 11 Sept and the thread initiated by Dennis Reedy back
> in Jul/Aug.
>
> I see therein a consensus (of only a few voices;-) to rather get a
> release out rather than wait until all the Jira issues "officially
> scheduled" for AR2 are closed. (I also note some discussion around
> improving tests, but that's a bit out of my spheres of competence or
> interest.) I didn't see anything where anyone said "OK let's do
> AR2", hence sticking my head in the noose ;-)
>
> So let me call for a vote: Do we feel we're ready to cut the next
> release
>
> [ ] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
> [ ] only after we've nailed all the issues currently scheduled for AR2
>
> --
> mike morris :: mikro2nd (at) gmail (dot) com
>
> http://mikro2nd.net/
> http://mikro2nd.net/blog/planb/
> http://mikro2nd.net/blog/mike/
>
> This email is [X]bloggable [ ]ask-first [ ]private
>
Re: [VOTE] AR2 Release?
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@mac.com>.
+1.
On Oct 9, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [x] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
>
> Release early, release often!
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] AR2 Release?
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
[x] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
Release early, release often!
BR,
Jukka Zitting