You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Paul Golick <go...@us.ibm.com> on 2007/04/02 19:23:21 UTC
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 (IBMers involved
with EMF code)
Frank,
Were you the only IBM employee involved in the contribution of this code
that is common to Apache Tuscany and to Eclipse EMF?
If not, who were the other IBM employees?
If it accurate to categorize the code as "common to Apache Tuscany and to
Eclipse EMF"? or would you prefer a different description?
This will answer a question for the "enhanced pedigree review" of the
Tuscany code so that we can ship SOA Feature Pack Iteration 1.
Regards,
Paul Golick
P. O. Box 12195, Dept. 6HSA (503 D224)
3039 Cornwallis Rd.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2195
office phone: 919-543-7177
cell phone: 919-943-2578
home phone: 919-493-3570
e-mail: golick@us.ibm.com
Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com>
2007-03-22 09:01 AM
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1
Thank goodness, common sense applies :-)
Now we can proceed with the release candidate.
Thanks,
Frank.
sa3ruby@gmail.com wrote on 03/21/2007 05:27:35 PM:
> On 3/21/07, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
> >
> > > I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to
> > > Apache
> > > to reuse the two EMF files in question.
> >
> > Thanks for confirming this.
> >
> > >
> > > I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the two base classes,
> > > provided in
> > > an attachment.
> > >
> > > Jeremy, let me know if this is good enough for you, or if you still
> > > want
> > > me to remove the Tuscany subclasses and resubmit them.
> >
> > I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as
> > described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want
> > something official from IBM (Software Grant).
>
> I am a director of the ASF.
>
> Apparently the original copyright holder desires to contribute the
> same code to two different places under two different licenses. They
> are certainly within their rights to do so. The contribution under
> the other license isn't particularly relevant to me. Now, concerning
> the contribution which is presumably being made in good faith under
> the ASF license to the Tuscany project, I see no ASF wide legal or
> policy issue here, which means that the only remaining issue a
> technical one, namely whether or not tuscany wishes to accept this
> code.
>
> Now, if anybody has any reason to believe that the assertion of
> authorship is false (i.e., if there are Eclipse CVS or SVN logs which
> show contributions by others), then the issue is an entirely different
> one...
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 (IBMers involved
with EMF code)
Posted by Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Paul Golick <go...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 04/02/2007 01:23:21 PM:
[snip]
> Is it accurate to categorize the code as "common to Apache Tuscany and
to
> Eclipse EMF"? or would you prefer a different description?
We won't have exactly the same code in both projects. The two EMF classes,
described below, are "code that IBM has contributed to both Eclipse EMF
and Apache Tuscany".
Thanks,
Frank.
[snip]
> Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com>
> 2007-03-22 09:01 AM
> Please respond to
> tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
> To
> tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank goodness, common sense applies :-)
>
> Now we can proceed with the release candidate.
>
> Thanks,
> Frank.
>
> sa3ruby@gmail.com wrote on 03/21/2007 05:27:35 PM:
>
> > On 3/21/07, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to
> > > > Apache
> > > > to reuse the two EMF files in question.
> > >
> > > Thanks for confirming this.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the two base classes,
> > > > provided in
> > > > an attachment.
> > > >
> > > > Jeremy, let me know if this is good enough for you, or if you
still
> > > > want
> > > > me to remove the Tuscany subclasses and resubmit them.
> > >
> > > I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as
> > > described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want
> > > something official from IBM (Software Grant).
> >
> > I am a director of the ASF.
> >
> > Apparently the original copyright holder desires to contribute the
> > same code to two different places under two different licenses. They
> > are certainly within their rights to do so. The contribution under
> > the other license isn't particularly relevant to me. Now, concerning
> > the contribution which is presumably being made in good faith under
> > the ASF license to the Tuscany project, I see no ASF wide legal or
> > policy issue here, which means that the only remaining issue a
> > technical one, namely whether or not tuscany wishes to accept this
> > code.
> >
> > Now, if anybody has any reason to believe that the assertion of
> > authorship is false (i.e., if there are Eclipse CVS or SVN logs which
> > show contributions by others), then the issue is an entirely different
> > one...
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org