Re: I don't think the URIDNSBL is working on spams yet

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Jeff Chan writes:
> On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 10:26:47 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >>I just upgraded my DNS and URI, URIDNSBL appears to be working 
> >>correctly
> >>now. I'm getting all of the benefits of 3.0.2!
> >>
> >>The URIDNSBL is pure genius, thanks to all who help create and 
> >>support the
> >>SA product.
> 
> > Glad you got it fixed. Believe me, the conference call that started URIDNSBL
> > was my favorite conference call so far :)  I'm guessing only a conference
> > call from the lottery commision and the Ferrari dealership would top it. 
> 
> Minor historical note:  URIDNSBL.pm existed before SURBLs, but it
> contained just one program, uridnsbl, which is the URI domain NS
> record check against sbl.spamhaus.org.  The SpamAssassin developers
> added urirhs* to use SURBLs with URIDNSBL.pm after they saw how
> well it worked, perhaps with SpamCopURI....  (That last bit of
> history I'm only guessing.  :-)

nah dude, we did it at the same time ;)   urirhs* was just a bit more
work.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFCJaPCMJF5cimLx9ARAjbtAJ9EtY6FKMTXan0pTVyefImmQs4yUQCfc84L
g8gU+dZLBVqG600uyO0CgO0=
=O4TA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----