You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@metamodel.apache.org by kaspersorensen <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2016/10/16 04:05:02 UTC

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120
  
    OK so I have been going over this in my mind again and again a few times. Couldn't quite make myself remove the tenant concept either :-P At least I feel it needs a bit more thought. One of the things I like about it in a URL pattern like `/{tenant}/{datastore}`is that it allows for simple authorization schemes to grant access to `/{some-tenant}/*` and thereby make someone a tenant administator. Similarly of course a particular datastore could be authorized by using the URL pattern. Not having any such "outer collection name" means that setting up access rules becomes a lot more difficult. Whether it is tenant or some other grouping term I don't mind so much. It just feels like a big aid in organizing the catalog of datastores.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---