You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/11/16 06:55:47 UTC

[GitHub] walking98 opened a new issue #546: Transactional Message can not be a delay message

walking98 opened a new issue #546: Transactional Message can not be a delay message
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/546
 
 
   The issue tracker is **ONLY** used for bug report and feature request. Keep in mind, please check whether there is an existing same report before your raise a new one.
   
   Alternately (especially if your communication is not a bug report), you can send mail to our [mailing lists](http://rocketmq.apache.org/about/contact/). We welcome any friendly suggestions, bug fixes, collaboration and other improvements.
   
   Please ensure that your bug report is clear and that it is complete. Otherwise, we may be unable to understand it or to reproduce it, either of which would prevent us from fixing the bug. We strongly recommend the report(bug report or feature request) could include some hints as the following:
   
   **BUG REPORT**
   
   1. Please describe the issue you observed:
   
   This is related the PR https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/527 
   Currently the transactional message can not be a delay message. we need a check logic for this.
   
   You can verify this by example/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/example/transaction/TransactionProducer.java
   to add the delayLevel property before sending message in transaction, e.g.:
       msg.setDelayTimeLevel(3);
   
   
   2. Please tell us about your environment:
   
   3. Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, logs, related issues, suggestions how to fix, etc):
   
   **FEATURE REQUEST**
   
   1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.
   
   2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
   
   2. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
   
   4. If there are some sub-tasks using -[] for each subtask and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub task:
   
   - [sub-task1-issue-number](example_sub_issue1_link_here): sub-task1 description here, 
   - [sub-task2-issue-number](example_sub_issue2_link_here): sub-task2 description here,
   - ...
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services