Is there a checksum for the latest release?

[Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca>]

It doesn't look like my original message was received by the list, so I'll try again.

Before I download the current version, I would like to get the MD5 checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and checksums for older releases.
Is there no checksum for the latest release?
Thanks,
Bill 

Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?

[Patrick Linskey <pl...@gmail.com>]

> I'll pull the copy I made from my public space. I don't really have a
> preference regarding md5sums, I just thought they were left out
> accidentally.

I'm all in favor of keeping things simpler during the deploy process.
I think that we should just get rid of the column, unless there's a
good reason to keep it.

-Patrick

On 9/6/07, Michael Dick <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looks like I missed this thread :-)
>
> I'll pull the copy I made from my public space. I don't really have a
> preference regarding md5sums, I just thought they were left out
> accidentally.
>
> -Mike
>
> On 9/6/07, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> >
> > There has been a lot of discussion in the incubator on the topic of
> > whether md5 is required or even recommended. Last I recall, since the
> > release is signed, md5 is extra and optional.
> >
> > I wouldn't recommend that we add md5 to our process here. Others can
> > express their opinions...
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Bill Slack wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Patrick
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Linskey"
> > > <pl...@gmail.com>
> > > To: <us...@openjpa.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:58 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?
> > >
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I think that we've only got PGP this time around. IIRC, we did this
> > >> because we only need PGP keys for Apache release requirements, and
> > >> probably generating MD5 checksums also was either too slow or hard to
> > >> do from mvn.
> > >>
> > >> -Patrick
> > >>
> > >> On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> > >>> It doesn't look like my original message was received by the
> > >>> list, so I'll try again.
> > >>>
> > >>> Before I download the current version, I would like to get the
> > >>> MD5 checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and
> > >>> checksums for older releases.
> > >>> Is there no checksum for the latest release?
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Bill
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Patrick Linskey
> > >> 202 669 5907
> > >
> >
> > Craig Russell
> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907

Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?

[Michael Dick <mi...@apache.org>]

Looks like I missed this thread :-)

I'll pull the copy I made from my public space. I don't really have a
preference regarding md5sums, I just thought they were left out
accidentally.

-Mike

On 9/6/07, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> There has been a lot of discussion in the incubator on the topic of
> whether md5 is required or even recommended. Last I recall, since the
> release is signed, md5 is extra and optional.
>
> I wouldn't recommend that we add md5 to our process here. Others can
> express their opinions...
>
> Craig
>
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Bill Slack wrote:
>
> > Thanks Patrick
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Linskey"
> > <pl...@gmail.com>
> > To: <us...@openjpa.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think that we've only got PGP this time around. IIRC, we did this
> >> because we only need PGP keys for Apache release requirements, and
> >> probably generating MD5 checksums also was either too slow or hard to
> >> do from mvn.
> >>
> >> -Patrick
> >>
> >> On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >>> It doesn't look like my original message was received by the
> >>> list, so I'll try again.
> >>>
> >>> Before I download the current version, I would like to get the
> >>> MD5 checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and
> >>> checksums for older releases.
> >>> Is there no checksum for the latest release?
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Patrick Linskey
> >> 202 669 5907
> >
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>

Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?

[Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>]

There has been a lot of discussion in the incubator on the topic of  
whether md5 is required or even recommended. Last I recall, since the  
release is signed, md5 is extra and optional.

I wouldn't recommend that we add md5 to our process here. Others can  
express their opinions...

Craig

On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Bill Slack wrote:

> Thanks Patrick
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Linskey"  
> <pl...@gmail.com>
> To: <us...@openjpa.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think that we've only got PGP this time around. IIRC, we did this
>> because we only need PGP keys for Apache release requirements, and
>> probably generating MD5 checksums also was either too slow or hard to
>> do from mvn.
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>> On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>> It doesn't look like my original message was received by the  
>>> list, so I'll try again.
>>>
>>> Before I download the current version, I would like to get the  
>>> MD5 checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and  
>>> checksums for older releases.
>>> Is there no checksum for the latest release?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bill
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Patrick Linskey
>> 202 669 5907
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?

[Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca>]

I saw the empty boxes in the tables; and it's mostly what I've needed.
Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick Linskey" <pl...@gmail.com>
To: <us...@openjpa.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?


> BTW, what made you ask? Was it because you prefer md5sums, or because
> you saw the empty boxes in the table?
> 
> -Patrick
> 
> On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> Thanks Patrick
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Patrick Linskey" <pl...@gmail.com>
>> To: <us...@openjpa.apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:58 PM
>> Subject: Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?
>>
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I think that we've only got PGP this time around. IIRC, we did this
>> > because we only need PGP keys for Apache release requirements, and
>> > probably generating MD5 checksums also was either too slow or hard to
>> > do from mvn.
>> >
>> > -Patrick
>> >
>> > On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> >> It doesn't look like my original message was received by the list, so
>> >> I'll try again.
>> >>
>> >> Before I download the current version, I would like to get the MD5
>> >> checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and checksums for
>> >> older releases.
>> >> Is there no checksum for the latest release?
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Bill
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Patrick Linskey
>> > 202 669 5907
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Patrick Linskey
> 202 669 5907

Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?

[Patrick Linskey <pl...@gmail.com>]

BTW, what made you ask? Was it because you prefer md5sums, or because
you saw the empty boxes in the table?

-Patrick

On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Thanks Patrick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Linskey" <pl...@gmail.com>
> To: <us...@openjpa.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think that we've only got PGP this time around. IIRC, we did this
> > because we only need PGP keys for Apache release requirements, and
> > probably generating MD5 checksums also was either too slow or hard to
> > do from mvn.
> >
> > -Patrick
> >
> > On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >> It doesn't look like my original message was received by the list, so
> >> I'll try again.
> >>
> >> Before I download the current version, I would like to get the MD5
> >> checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and checksums for
> >> older releases.
> >> Is there no checksum for the latest release?
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bill
> >
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Linskey
> > 202 669 5907
>
>


-- 
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907

Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?

[Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca>]

Thanks Patrick

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick Linskey" <pl...@gmail.com>
To: <us...@openjpa.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?


> Hi,
>
> I think that we've only got PGP this time around. IIRC, we did this
> because we only need PGP keys for Apache release requirements, and
> probably generating MD5 checksums also was either too slow or hard to
> do from mvn.
>
> -Patrick
>
> On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> It doesn't look like my original message was received by the list, so 
>> I'll try again.
>>
>> Before I download the current version, I would like to get the MD5 
>> checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and checksums for 
>> older releases.
>> Is there no checksum for the latest release?
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
>
>
> -- 
> Patrick Linskey
> 202 669 5907 

Re: Is there a checksum for the latest release?

[Patrick Linskey <pl...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I think that we've only got PGP this time around. IIRC, we did this
because we only need PGP keys for Apache release requirements, and
probably generating MD5 checksums also was either too slow or hard to
do from mvn.

-Patrick

On 9/5/07, Bill Slack <ws...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> It doesn't look like my original message was received by the list, so I'll try again.
>
> Before I download the current version, I would like to get the MD5 checksum, but all I can find are the PGP signatures and checksums for older releases.
> Is there no checksum for the latest release?
> Thanks,
> Bill


-- 
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907