You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/04 16:59:31 UTC
[VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0-M5.1 release.
This is a minor relese based on 2.0-M5 and provides fixes to running
Tuscany applications in Google AppEngine environment and other minor
fixes to remove compliance tests run from part of the source distro
build.
The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
The release tag is at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
Here is my +1
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
Ok, I made some changes based on what I reported previously in this
thread. Please take a look as see if this is correct. The artifacts in
question are test only, shouldn't appear in the binary distro and
hence I don't believe the LICENSE/NOTICE files shipped with the maven
modules are affected.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Well the informal rule I've tried to apply so far in these kinds of cases is
>>>
>>> 1 - if we mention things that aren't in the distro then it's not great
>>> but I could live with it until the next distro
>>> 2 - if we don't mention things that are in the distro then that's not so good.
>>>
>>> There are several things that come under category 1 but I could live with them
>>> binding-ws, databinding-jaxb-axiom, interface-wsdl come under category
>>> 2 w.r.t that last license. The problem with this is where do you stop.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, I'll look into this over the weekend and provide a new RC
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>
> Hi Luciano
>
> I was looking at this and have a couple of LICENSE changes I'll commit
> shortly for review.
>
> Simon
>
A fix, even better :) Just let me know when you are done, but I most
will probably only be able to get to this over the weekend.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Well the informal rule I've tried to apply so far in these kinds of cases is
>>
>> 1 - if we mention things that aren't in the distro then it's not great
>> but I could live with it until the next distro
>> 2 - if we don't mention things that are in the distro then that's not so good.
>>
>> There are several things that come under category 1 but I could live with them
>> binding-ws, databinding-jaxb-axiom, interface-wsdl come under category
>> 2 w.r.t that last license. The problem with this is where do you stop.
>>
>
> Ok, I'll look into this over the weekend and provide a new RC
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Hi Luciano
I was looking at this and have a couple of LICENSE changes I'll commit
shortly for review.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Well the informal rule I've tried to apply so far in these kinds of cases is
>
> 1 - if we mention things that aren't in the distro then it's not great
> but I could live with it until the next distro
> 2 - if we don't mention things that are in the distro then that's not so good.
>
> There are several things that come under category 1 but I could live with them
> binding-ws, databinding-jaxb-axiom, interface-wsdl come under category
> 2 w.r.t that last license. The problem with this is where do you stop.
>
Ok, I'll look into this over the weekend and provide a new RC
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:48 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0-M5.1 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a minor relese based on 2.0-M5 and provides fixes to running
>>>>>> Tuscany applications in Google AppEngine environment and other minor
>>>>>> fixes to remove compliance tests run from part of the source distro
>>>>>> build.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
>>>>>> are available for review at:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release tag is at:
>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ping ? The M5.1 has a very small delta from M5 and should be a easy review.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will try to get to this today, just have been too busy to spend time
>>>> on it so far sorry.
>>>>
>>>> ...ant
>>>>
>>> Sorry Luciano. Only just got to this. Will take a look now.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>> --
>>> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
>>> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>>>
>>
>> - Rat looks OK
>>
>> - Build of source with clean repo initially failed with...
>>
>> Reason: POM 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin' not found in reposi
>> tory: Unable to download the artifact from any repository
>>
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:pom:2.2-beta-3
>>
>> But it worked this morning when I retried.
>>
>> - Key signatures look good
>>
>> - I tried some samples. The READMEs still leave a lot to be desired.
>> This isn't any worse than M5 however. We know we have to make a better
>> fist of this, hence the re-org in trunk.
>>
>> - The samples build against the staged maven artifacts
>>
>> - In the bin distro LICENCE file we refer to tuscany-assembly-xsd.jar
>> and tuscany-sca-api.jar without explicit version numbers. This has
>> always been the case but I wonder if we should. I also note that we
>> refer to tuscany-assembly-xsd-osoa in the LICENSE which is not present
>> any more.
>>
>> - There are some odd things in the src distro LICENSE file (they were
>> like this in M5 but I for one didn't spot them).
>>
>> The module itest/databindings/common isn't in the src distro
>>
>> The module definitions-xml isn't in the src distro
>>
>> The last section which starts with...
>>
>> =================
>> The module assembly-xsd includes XSD files under the following license:
>>
>> The modules
>>
>> binding-ws-xml
>> databinding
>> databinding-axiom
>> databinding-jaxb
>> databinding-json
>> databinding-sdo
>> databinding-sdo-axiom
>> databinding-xmlbeans
>> interface-wsdl-xml
>>
>> Include the ipo.xsd and address.xsd information from the XML Schema Primer
>> =================
>>
>> It looks like the "The module assembly-xsd includes XSD files under
>> the following license:" is just a cut and paste as this appears in
>> front of the previous license.
>>
>> Some of the listed modules have been removed or merged with other
>> modules. Some modules are missing. I believe the list should read.
>>
>> binding-ws
>> databinding
>> databinding-axiom
>> databinding-jaxb
>> databinding-jaxb-axiom
>> databinding-json
>> databinding-sdo
>> databinding-sdo-axiom
>> interface-wsdl
>>
>> I'd like to get the license files fixed before I vote to release.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>
> As these are all present in 2.0-M5, do you really think this is a MUST
> before we release 2.0-M5.1 ?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Well the informal rule I've tried to apply so far in these kinds of cases is
1 - if we mention things that aren't in the distro then it's not great
but I could live with it until the next distro
2 - if we don't mention things that are in the distro then that's not so good.
There are several things that come under category 1 but I could live with them
binding-ws, databinding-jaxb-axiom, interface-wsdl come under category
2 w.r.t that last license. The problem with this is where do you stop.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:48 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0-M5.1 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a minor relese based on 2.0-M5 and provides fixes to running
>>>>> Tuscany applications in Google AppEngine environment and other minor
>>>>> fixes to remove compliance tests run from part of the source distro
>>>>> build.
>>>>>
>>>>> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
>>>>> are available for review at:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>>>>
>>>>> The release tag is at:
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ping ? The M5.1 has a very small delta from M5 and should be a easy review.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I will try to get to this today, just have been too busy to spend time
>>> on it so far sorry.
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>>
>> Sorry Luciano. Only just got to this. Will take a look now.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> --
>> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
>> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>>
>
> - Rat looks OK
>
> - Build of source with clean repo initially failed with...
>
> Reason: POM 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin' not found in reposi
> tory: Unable to download the artifact from any repository
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:pom:2.2-beta-3
>
> But it worked this morning when I retried.
>
> - Key signatures look good
>
> - I tried some samples. The READMEs still leave a lot to be desired.
> This isn't any worse than M5 however. We know we have to make a better
> fist of this, hence the re-org in trunk.
>
> - The samples build against the staged maven artifacts
>
> - In the bin distro LICENCE file we refer to tuscany-assembly-xsd.jar
> and tuscany-sca-api.jar without explicit version numbers. This has
> always been the case but I wonder if we should. I also note that we
> refer to tuscany-assembly-xsd-osoa in the LICENSE which is not present
> any more.
>
> - There are some odd things in the src distro LICENSE file (they were
> like this in M5 but I for one didn't spot them).
>
> The module itest/databindings/common isn't in the src distro
>
> The module definitions-xml isn't in the src distro
>
> The last section which starts with...
>
> =================
> The module assembly-xsd includes XSD files under the following license:
>
> The modules
>
> binding-ws-xml
> databinding
> databinding-axiom
> databinding-jaxb
> databinding-json
> databinding-sdo
> databinding-sdo-axiom
> databinding-xmlbeans
> interface-wsdl-xml
>
> Include the ipo.xsd and address.xsd information from the XML Schema Primer
> =================
>
> It looks like the "The module assembly-xsd includes XSD files under
> the following license:" is just a cut and paste as this appears in
> front of the previous license.
>
> Some of the listed modules have been removed or merged with other
> modules. Some modules are missing. I believe the list should read.
>
> binding-ws
> databinding
> databinding-axiom
> databinding-jaxb
> databinding-jaxb-axiom
> databinding-json
> databinding-sdo
> databinding-sdo-axiom
> interface-wsdl
>
> I'd like to get the license files fixed before I vote to release.
>
> Regards
>
As these are all present in 2.0-M5, do you really think this is a MUST
before we release 2.0-M5.1 ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:48 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0-M5.1 release.
>>>>
>>>> This is a minor relese based on 2.0-M5 and provides fixes to running
>>>> Tuscany applications in Google AppEngine environment and other minor
>>>> fixes to remove compliance tests run from part of the source distro
>>>> build.
>>>>
>>>> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
>>>> are available for review at:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>>>
>>>> The release tag is at:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ping ? The M5.1 has a very small delta from M5 and should be a easy review.
>>>
>>
>> I will try to get to this today, just have been too busy to spend time
>> on it so far sorry.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
> Sorry Luciano. Only just got to this. Will take a look now.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>
- Rat looks OK
- Build of source with clean repo initially failed with...
Reason: POM 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin' not found in reposi
tory: Unable to download the artifact from any repository
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:pom:2.2-beta-3
But it worked this morning when I retried.
- Key signatures look good
- I tried some samples. The READMEs still leave a lot to be desired.
This isn't any worse than M5 however. We know we have to make a better
fist of this, hence the re-org in trunk.
- The samples build against the staged maven artifacts
- In the bin distro LICENCE file we refer to tuscany-assembly-xsd.jar
and tuscany-sca-api.jar without explicit version numbers. This has
always been the case but I wonder if we should. I also note that we
refer to tuscany-assembly-xsd-osoa in the LICENSE which is not present
any more.
- There are some odd things in the src distro LICENSE file (they were
like this in M5 but I for one didn't spot them).
The module itest/databindings/common isn't in the src distro
The module definitions-xml isn't in the src distro
The last section which starts with...
=================
The module assembly-xsd includes XSD files under the following license:
The modules
binding-ws-xml
databinding
databinding-axiom
databinding-jaxb
databinding-json
databinding-sdo
databinding-sdo-axiom
databinding-xmlbeans
interface-wsdl-xml
Include the ipo.xsd and address.xsd information from the XML Schema Primer
=================
It looks like the "The module assembly-xsd includes XSD files under
the following license:" is just a cut and paste as this appears in
front of the previous license.
Some of the listed modules have been removed or merged with other
modules. Some modules are missing. I believe the list should read.
binding-ws
databinding
databinding-axiom
databinding-jaxb
databinding-jaxb-axiom
databinding-json
databinding-sdo
databinding-sdo-axiom
interface-wsdl
I'd like to get the license files fixed before I vote to release.
Regards
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:48 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0-M5.1 release.
>>>
>>> This is a minor relese based on 2.0-M5 and provides fixes to running
>>> Tuscany applications in Google AppEngine environment and other minor
>>> fixes to remove compliance tests run from part of the source distro
>>> build.
>>>
>>> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
>>> are available for review at:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>>
>>> The release tag is at:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>
>> Ping ? The M5.1 has a very small delta from M5 and should be a easy review.
>>
>
> I will try to get to this today, just have been too busy to spend time
> on it so far sorry.
>
> ...ant
>
Sorry Luciano. Only just got to this. Will take a look now.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0-M5.1 release.
>>
>> This is a minor relese based on 2.0-M5 and provides fixes to running
>> Tuscany applications in Google AppEngine environment and other minor
>> fixes to remove compliance tests run from part of the source distro
>> build.
>>
>> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
>> are available for review at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>
>> The release tag is at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>
> Ping ? The M5.1 has a very small delta from M5 and should be a easy review.
>
I will try to get to this today, just have been too busy to spend time
on it so far sorry.
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0-M5.1 release.
>
> This is a minor relese based on 2.0-M5 and provides fixes to running
> Tuscany applications in Google AppEngine environment and other minor
> fixes to remove compliance tests run from part of the source distro
> build.
>
> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
> are available for review at:
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>
> The release tag is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>
> Here is my +1
>
Ping ? The M5.1 has a very small delta from M5 and should be a easy review.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-M5.1 RC1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0-M5.1 release.
>
> This is a minor relese based on 2.0-M5 and provides fixes to running
> Tuscany applications in Google AppEngine environment and other minor
> fixes to remove compliance tests run from part of the source distro
> build.
>
> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
> are available for review at:
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>
> The release tag is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5.1-RC1/
>
> Here is my +1
>
It looks ok to me. The store-webapp sample has target/ and its
sub-folders included in the binary distro so it includes unnecessary
files and a lot of duplicate jars which add to the binary distribution
size but thats not a blocker as the licenses are all there. I hadn't
looked at the licensing in as much detail as Simon so it looked ok to
me, not totally clear if there is actually any license missing and its
as good as M5 so i'd probably give it a +1 if pushed.
...ant