You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com> on 2008/05/14 14:12:24 UTC
Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
ant elder wrote:
> i'm happy to wait till ... I've got things more working
>
> ...ant
>
Ant,
Yes - I'm happy for you to beaver away getting it ready, but keep off general release until it does
work OK ;-)
Yours, Mike.
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Mike Edwards <
mike.edwards.inglenook@gmail.com> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM
>>> data transformation. It seems that the Axis2 1.4 has done a lot of good
>>> work
>>> there. If possible, I would like to leverage the latest AXIOM and Axis2
>>> code
>>> base ASAP. The dependency might be only AXIOM but mixing the versions of
>>> AXIOM could be very risky.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Raymond
>>>
>>>
>> If moving up ASAP really will help get the performance work moving then
>> another alternative could be to just do the upgrade as much as possible
>> right now in trunk commenting out the tests that are failing and then
>> slowly
>> over the next days get everything going again. I have it mostly going
>> right
>> now apart from WS policy and the tooling but those things may take a
>> little
>> while to sort out.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> Folks,
>
> Who is screaming for this stuff??
>
> I'd prefer to wait until the Axis guys have their stuff fully cooked...
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
Fair enough, i'm happy to wait till its all released and I've got things
more working
...ant
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM
>> data transformation. It seems that the Axis2 1.4 has done a lot of good work
>> there. If possible, I would like to leverage the latest AXIOM and Axis2 code
>> base ASAP. The dependency might be only AXIOM but mixing the versions of
>> AXIOM could be very risky.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>
> If moving up ASAP really will help get the performance work moving then
> another alternative could be to just do the upgrade as much as possible
> right now in trunk commenting out the tests that are failing and then slowly
> over the next days get everything going again. I have it mostly going right
> now apart from WS policy and the tooling but those things may take a little
> while to sort out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> ...ant
>
Folks,
Who is screaming for this stuff??
I'd prefer to wait until the Axis guys have their stuff fully cooked...
Yours, Mike.
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM
> data transformation. It seems that the Axis2 1.4 has done a lot of good work
> there. If possible, I would like to leverage the latest AXIOM and Axis2 code
> base ASAP. The dependency might be only AXIOM but mixing the versions of
> AXIOM could be very risky.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
If moving up ASAP really will help get the performance work moving then
another alternative could be to just do the upgrade as much as possible
right now in trunk commenting out the tests that are failing and then slowly
over the next days get everything going again. I have it mostly going right
now apart from WS policy and the tooling but those things may take a little
while to sort out.
WDYT?
...ant
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM
data transformation. It seems that the Axis2 1.4 has done a lot of good work
there. If possible, I would like to leverage the latest AXIOM and Axis2 code
base ASAP. The dependency might be only AXIOM but mixing the versions of
AXIOM could be very risky.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:00 AM
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Mike Edwards
> <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Lou Amodeo wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>>>
>> Lou,
>>
>> Any particular goodies that we can expect to get by moving up to Axis
>> 1.4?
>>
>> Yours, Mike.
>>
>
> Not sure if there are new functions that we need in 1.4 but the
> release does include _lots_ of bug fixes so i think it would be worth
> moving up. The main issues right now is I've just noticed there isn't
> a corresponding Apache Rampart release for 1.4 yet which is what we
> need for WS-Security, looks like its coming so guess we'll just have
> to wait a bit.
>
> ...ant
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Mike Edwards
<mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lou Amodeo wrote:
>>
>> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>>
> Lou,
>
> Any particular goodies that we can expect to get by moving up to Axis 1.4?
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
Not sure if there are new functions that we need in 1.4 but the
release does include _lots_ of bug fixes so i think it would be worth
moving up. The main issues right now is I've just noticed there isn't
a corresponding Apache Rampart release for 1.4 yet which is what we
need for WS-Security, looks like its coming so guess we'll just have
to wait a bit.
...ant
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
Lou Amodeo wrote:
> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>
Lou,
Any particular goodies that we can expect to get by moving up to Axis 1.4?
Yours, Mike.
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Mike Edwards <
mike.edwards.inglenook@gmail.com> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
>>> out and available in the Maven repositories now. I've still a couple of
>>> issues to resolve to get everything in the build working with 1.4 but
>>> hope
>>> to have those fixed in the next day or 2 so would like to move up to 1.4
>>> then
>>>
>>>
>> This isn't going so well so I'm wondering if it would be better to NOT
>> move
>> up to Axis2 1.4 for the SCA 1.3 release. The are still some minor issues
>> that are more of an inconvenience eg the way our soap/jms support is
>> configured causes a big ugly stacktrace in samples that don't incude the
>> JMS
>> API now, but the main problem is with ws-security not working yet and when
>> that is fixed a bug in WSS4J we'll like hit which may need a new release
>> to
>> fix [1]. How would people feel about staying on Axis2 1.3 for now, i know
>> there's a dessire to get the latest versions of XmlSchema and AXIOM but
>> will
>> it break anything in our 1.3 release if we don't do that?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/2t7kdnf2tw33sphg
>>
>>
> Mention of problems with WS-Security makes me head for the hills....
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
So it looks like Axis2 1.4.1 is out now. Is there anyone out there who
fancies having a go at upgrading the Tuscany runtime from 1.3 to 1.4.1?
Simon
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>>>
>>
>> Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
>> out and available in the Maven repositories now. I've still a couple of
>> issues to resolve to get everything in the build working with 1.4 but hope
>> to have those fixed in the next day or 2 so would like to move up to 1.4
>> then
>>
>
> This isn't going so well so I'm wondering if it would be better to NOT move
> up to Axis2 1.4 for the SCA 1.3 release. The are still some minor issues
> that are more of an inconvenience eg the way our soap/jms support is
> configured causes a big ugly stacktrace in samples that don't incude the JMS
> API now, but the main problem is with ws-security not working yet and when
> that is fixed a bug in WSS4J we'll like hit which may need a new release to
> fix [1]. How would people feel about staying on Axis2 1.3 for now, i know
> there's a dessire to get the latest versions of XmlSchema and AXIOM but will
> it break anything in our 1.3 release if we don't do that?
>
> ...ant
>
> [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/2t7kdnf2tw33sphg
>
Mention of problems with WS-Security makes me head for the hills....
Yours, Mike.
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
Simon Laws wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
>>> out and available in the Maven repositories now. I've still a couple of
>>> issues to resolve to get everything in the build working with 1.4 but
>> hope
>>> to have those fixed in the next day or 2 so would like to move up to 1.4
>>> then
>>>
>> This isn't going so well so I'm wondering if it would be better to NOT move
>> up to Axis2 1.4 for the SCA 1.3 release. The are still some minor issues
>> that are more of an inconvenience eg the way our soap/jms support is
>> configured causes a big ugly stacktrace in samples that don't incude the
>> JMS
>> API now, but the main problem is with ws-security not working yet and when
>> that is fixed a bug in WSS4J we'll like hit which may need a new release to
>> fix [1]. How would people feel about staying on Axis2 1.3 for now, i know
>> there's a dessire to get the latest versions of XmlSchema and AXIOM but
>> will
>> it break anything in our 1.3 release if we don't do that?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/2t7kdnf2tw33sphg
>>
>
> Hi
>
> I would err on the side of caution with this. I don't think it's a blocker
> for cutting the branch for 1.3 and it sounds like we are still dependent on
> the 3rd party WSS4J 1.5.5 release which could take weeks. If this comes out
> and we are happy with it in trunk we can consider patching it into the 1.3
> branch but I think we should go without it for now.
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
I agree with the cautious approach.
Simon
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
> >>
> >
> >
> > Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
> > out and available in the Maven repositories now. I've still a couple of
> > issues to resolve to get everything in the build working with 1.4 but
> hope
> > to have those fixed in the next day or 2 so would like to move up to 1.4
> > then
> >
>
> This isn't going so well so I'm wondering if it would be better to NOT move
> up to Axis2 1.4 for the SCA 1.3 release. The are still some minor issues
> that are more of an inconvenience eg the way our soap/jms support is
> configured causes a big ugly stacktrace in samples that don't incude the
> JMS
> API now, but the main problem is with ws-security not working yet and when
> that is fixed a bug in WSS4J we'll like hit which may need a new release to
> fix [1]. How would people feel about staying on Axis2 1.3 for now, i know
> there's a dessire to get the latest versions of XmlSchema and AXIOM but
> will
> it break anything in our 1.3 release if we don't do that?
>
> ...ant
>
> [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/2t7kdnf2tw33sphg
>
Hi
I would err on the side of caution with this. I don't think it's a blocker
for cutting the branch for 1.3 and it sounds like we are still dependent on
the 3rd party WSS4J 1.5.5 release which could take weeks. If this comes out
and we are happy with it in trunk we can consider patching it into the 1.3
branch but I think we should go without it for now.
Regards
Simon
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>>
>
>
> Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
> out and available in the Maven repositories now. I've still a couple of
> issues to resolve to get everything in the build working with 1.4 but hope
> to have those fixed in the next day or 2 so would like to move up to 1.4
> then
>
This isn't going so well so I'm wondering if it would be better to NOT move
up to Axis2 1.4 for the SCA 1.3 release. The are still some minor issues
that are more of an inconvenience eg the way our soap/jms support is
configured causes a big ugly stacktrace in samples that don't incude the JMS
API now, but the main problem is with ws-security not working yet and when
that is fixed a bug in WSS4J we'll like hit which may need a new release to
fix [1]. How would people feel about staying on Axis2 1.3 for now, i know
there's a dessire to get the latest versions of XmlSchema and AXIOM but will
it break anything in our 1.3 release if we don't do that?
...ant
[1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/2t7kdnf2tw33sphg
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
> >
>
>
> Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
> out
> and available in the Maven repositories now. I've still a couple of issues
> to resolve to get everything in the build working with 1.4 but hope to have
> those fixed in the next day or 2 so would like to move up to 1.4 then
>
> ...ant
>
Assuming that the full build builds OK then +1 from me.
Simon
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com>.
+1.4 to move up to Axis 1.4.
Raymond Feng wrote:
> +1 to move up. We can also start to take advantage of the latest
> versions of XmlSchema and AXIOM.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 2:17 AM
> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>>>
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
+1 to move up. We can also start to take advantage of the latest versions of
XmlSchema and AXIOM.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 2:17 AM
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>>
>
>
> Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
> out
> and available in the Maven repositories now. I've still a couple of issues
> to resolve to get everything in the build working with 1.4 but hope to
> have
> those fixed in the next day or 2 so would like to move up to 1.4 then
>
> ...ant
>
Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
>
Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all out
and available in the Maven repositories now. I've still a couple of issues
to resolve to get everything in the build working with 1.4 but hope to have
those fixed in the next day or 2 so would like to move up to 1.4 then
...ant