You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by RW <rw...@googlemail.com> on 2014/02/02 14:12:11 UTC
Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:32:33 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> After repeated learning as ham I get BAYES_50 at least for the latter
> message, but I still wonder, how exactly does spamassassin identify
> messages that do not contain Message-Id?
It never uses Message-Id, it uses a hash of the date header and the
top part of the body (and up to the 3.3.x releases the bottom received
header).
Re: not learned Ham with BAYES_99
Posted by Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>.
>On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:32:33 +0100
>Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> After repeated learning as ham I get BAYES_50 at least for the latter
>> message, but I still wonder, how exactly does spamassassin identify
>> messages that do not contain Message-Id?
On 02.02.14 13:12, RW wrote:
>It never uses Message-Id, it uses a hash of the date header and the
>top part of the body (and up to the 3.3.x releases the bottom received
>header).
This explains even more... so if sendmail modifies the Date: header (I
suspect it from doing so in ome cases) autolean called from milter can cause
such mail to be learned and never forgotten again....
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.