DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30843] New: - Partition workers2.properties

[bu...@apache.org]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30843>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30843

Partition workers2.properties

           Summary: Partition workers2.properties
           Product: Tomcat 5
           Version: 5.0.27
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Enhancement
          Priority: Other
         Component: Native:JK
        AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: bjoern@syltonline.de


Hi,

is it possible to partition the workers2.properties for the JK2?

We got JK2 running as a ISAPI-Filter on IIS6.
Now, the new structure of "workers2.properties" is better 
against "workers.properties" and "uriworkermap.properties".

But now, that we have loads of webs with many contexts each, which itself have 
2-5 mappings each, the file get's huge (>40kb) and complex.

Is it possible to partition the file, say, with "include={file}" statements?
Or better...

[include:file]
file={file}
ver=1

... this way the the main and subfiles (Mappings, Worker, Channels, ...) 
remain clear, and even a reload is faster, because the jk2 only needs to read 
the included files which version-numbers have increased.

thanks for your brill work...
--
Björn Andersen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org