You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by "stephen mallette (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/04/05 12:44:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1927) Gherkin scenario expects list with duplicates, but receives g:Set

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

stephen mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-1927:
-------------------------------------------

    Assignee: stephen mallette

> Gherkin scenario expects list with duplicates, but receives g:Set
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1927
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dotnet, javascript, python, test-suite
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.1
>            Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>            Assignee: stephen mallette
>            Priority: Major
>
> The scenario {{g_V_storeXaX_byXoutEXcreatedX_countX_out_out_storeXaX_byXinEXcreatedX_weight_sumX}} expects
> {code:java}
> | result |
> | d[1].l |
> | d[1].l |
> | d[0].l |
> | d[0].l |
> | d[0].l |
> | d[2].l |
> | d[1.0].d |
> | d[1.0].d |
> {code}
> but we receive this from the server:
> {code:java}
> {
>     "@type": "g:Set",
>     "@value": [
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 1
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 1
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 0
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 0
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 0
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 2
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Double",
>             "@value": 1
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Double",
>             "@value": 1
>         }
>     ]
> }
> {code}
> The set returned by the server contains 4 duplicates that shouldn't be part of the expected result in the scenario.
> Unfortunately, while working on TINKERPOP-1865 we noticed that gremlin-python and gremlin-javascript fail when the scenario is fixed like that. So those two GLVs probably need to be fixed to handle {{g:Set}} correctly.
> After fixing the scenario, it can be removed from the list of ignored scenarios in Gremlin.Net.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)