You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@reef.apache.org by Gyewon Lee <st...@gmail.com> on 2016/09/25 15:31:30 UTC
.Net Avro support union?
Hi.
I have some issue for writing DataContract for Avro schema including Union
object (in Tang). It seems that just using Object types for Union type is
not working. I checked the Nuget Avro version and but there is no release
note so that I cannot check whether this issue was resolved or not.
Any idea on this issue?
Best regards,
Gyewon
Re: .Net Avro support union?
Posted by Gyewon Lee <st...@gmail.com>.
Okay. I will re-submit my PR w/o Avro serialization and make a separate
issue after it is merged. All configurations containing named objects will
be ignored during serialization processes.
Again, thank you so much!
Best,
Gyewon
2016-09-27 0:58 GMT+09:00 Byung-Gon Chun <bg...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Gyewon,
>
> As far as REEF-31 w/o Avro serialization does not break the .NET side, I'm
> fine with the plan.
>
> -Gon
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Gyewon Lee <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for your kind responses, Gon & Markus!
> >
> > I agree that REEF-31 should cohere with the current moving onto Protobuf
> > 3.x.
> >
> > The current REEF-31 commit has a change in Tang Avro Schema and it seems
> > that it causes a problem on .Net side. In this case, I think I can remove
> > Avro serialization part from REEF-31, and deal with serializations after
> > moving to Protobuf 3.x. has finished.
> >
> > How do you think about this plan?
> >
> > Best,
> > Gyewon
> >
> > 2016-09-26 15:18 GMT+09:00 Markus Weimer <ma...@weimo.de>:
> >
> > > On 2016-09-25 17:41, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> > >
> > >> We're in the process of replacing Avro with protobuf 3.x.
> > >> We may want to update REEF-31 to work with protobuf 3.x..
> > >>
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > However, we are in a bit of a limbo state until protobuf 3 has been
> added
> > > as a dependency. We might have to hold off on other protocol-related
> > > changes till that is done.
> > >
> > > Markus
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Byung-Gon Chun
>
Re: .Net Avro support union?
Posted by Byung-Gon Chun <bg...@gmail.com>.
Hi Gyewon,
As far as REEF-31 w/o Avro serialization does not break the .NET side, I'm
fine with the plan.
-Gon
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Gyewon Lee <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your kind responses, Gon & Markus!
>
> I agree that REEF-31 should cohere with the current moving onto Protobuf
> 3.x.
>
> The current REEF-31 commit has a change in Tang Avro Schema and it seems
> that it causes a problem on .Net side. In this case, I think I can remove
> Avro serialization part from REEF-31, and deal with serializations after
> moving to Protobuf 3.x. has finished.
>
> How do you think about this plan?
>
> Best,
> Gyewon
>
> 2016-09-26 15:18 GMT+09:00 Markus Weimer <ma...@weimo.de>:
>
> > On 2016-09-25 17:41, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> >
> >> We're in the process of replacing Avro with protobuf 3.x.
> >> We may want to update REEF-31 to work with protobuf 3.x..
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
> > However, we are in a bit of a limbo state until protobuf 3 has been added
> > as a dependency. We might have to hold off on other protocol-related
> > changes till that is done.
> >
> > Markus
> >
>
--
Byung-Gon Chun
Re: .Net Avro support union?
Posted by Gyewon Lee <st...@gmail.com>.
Thanks a lot for your kind responses, Gon & Markus!
I agree that REEF-31 should cohere with the current moving onto Protobuf
3.x.
The current REEF-31 commit has a change in Tang Avro Schema and it seems
that it causes a problem on .Net side. In this case, I think I can remove
Avro serialization part from REEF-31, and deal with serializations after
moving to Protobuf 3.x. has finished.
How do you think about this plan?
Best,
Gyewon
2016-09-26 15:18 GMT+09:00 Markus Weimer <ma...@weimo.de>:
> On 2016-09-25 17:41, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
>
>> We're in the process of replacing Avro with protobuf 3.x.
>> We may want to update REEF-31 to work with protobuf 3.x..
>>
>
> +1
>
> However, we are in a bit of a limbo state until protobuf 3 has been added
> as a dependency. We might have to hold off on other protocol-related
> changes till that is done.
>
> Markus
>
Re: .Net Avro support union?
Posted by Markus Weimer <ma...@weimo.de>.
On 2016-09-25 17:41, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> We're in the process of replacing Avro with protobuf 3.x.
> We may want to update REEF-31 to work with protobuf 3.x..
+1
However, we are in a bit of a limbo state until protobuf 3 has been
added as a dependency. We might have to hold off on other
protocol-related changes till that is done.
Markus
Re: .Net Avro support union?
Posted by Byung-Gon Chun <bg...@gmail.com>.
Hi Gyewon,
We're in the process of replacing Avro with protobuf 3.x.
We may want to update REEF-31 to work with protobuf 3.x..
Thanks.
-Gon
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Gyewon Lee <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have some issue for writing DataContract for Avro schema including Union
> object (in Tang). It seems that just using Object types for Union type is
> not working. I checked the Nuget Avro version and but there is no release
> note so that I cannot check whether this issue was resolved or not.
>
> Any idea on this issue?
>
> Best regards,
> Gyewon
>
--
Byung-Gon Chun