You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@oodt.apache.org by "Chris A. Mattmann (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/09/02 19:07:07 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (OODT-494) Decide whether or not we need ParallelProcessor

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Chris A. Mattmann updated OODT-494:
-----------------------------------

    Issue Type: Sub-task  (was: Improvement)
        Parent: OODT-491
    
> Decide whether or not we need ParallelProcessor
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OODT-494
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-494
>             Project: OODT
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: workflow manager
>            Reporter: Chris A. Mattmann
>            Assignee: Chris A. Mattmann
>             Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> In the PackagedWorkflowRepository, I managed to get away without having to do any parallel workflow graphs, and simply used sequential models, along with the event-based system of the workflow manager. Thus, I'm not sure we explicitly need a parallel processor. Decide on whether or not to keep it.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira