You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> on 2009/07/24 11:26:19 UTC
More sandbox build woes
Two more issues:
- the incubator maven repo is not declared in the sandbox pom,
so the build fails if you don't have uima-2.2.2-incubating
in your local repo. Where's the best place to declare this
and how is this information propagated to the individual
projects?
- the pear packaging maven plugin project must be built first
and manually if it's not in the local repo yet. I find that
acceptable, but it would be nicer if it wasn't necessary.
If it needs to stay this way, it should be documented.
--Thilo
Re: More sandbox build woes
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
+1 cause it would make building simpler.
2009/7/27 Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>
> +1 also from my side.
> It was always complicated with the pre-build requirement of the plugin to
> build the UIMA Sandbox,
> but unfortunately Maven does not support a pre-build step that helps to
> solve that issue.
>
> -- Michael
>
> Marshall Schor wrote:
> > no objections - sounds good. +1 to graduate it from sandbox and publish
> > to incubator repo. in next release.
> >
> > -Marshall
> >
> > Thilo Goetz wrote:
> >> Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thilo Goetz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> - the pear packaging maven plugin project must be built first
> >>>> and manually if it's not in the local repo yet. I find that
> >>>> acceptable, but it would be nicer if it wasn't necessary.
> >>>> If it needs to stay this way, it should be documented.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> The pear packaging plugin is not really useful for external
> >>> projects because of the burden to build it first.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe we can graduate it from the sandbox and publish
> >>> it to the incubator repo with the next release ?
> >>>
> >>> That would also solve the build problem temporary ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Jörn
> >>>
> >> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Objections, anyone?
> >>
> >> --Thilo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: More sandbox build woes
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
+1 also from my side.
It was always complicated with the pre-build requirement of the plugin to build the UIMA Sandbox,
but unfortunately Maven does not support a pre-build step that helps to solve that issue.
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
> no objections - sounds good. +1 to graduate it from sandbox and publish
> to incubator repo. in next release.
>
> -Marshall
>
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>>
>>> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>>
>>>> - the pear packaging maven plugin project must be built first
>>>> and manually if it's not in the local repo yet. I find that
>>>> acceptable, but it would be nicer if it wasn't necessary.
>>>> If it needs to stay this way, it should be documented.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The pear packaging plugin is not really useful for external
>>> projects because of the burden to build it first.
>>>
>>> Maybe we can graduate it from the sandbox and publish
>>> it to the incubator repo with the next release ?
>>>
>>> That would also solve the build problem temporary ;-)
>>>
>>> Jörn
>>>
>> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Objections, anyone?
>>
>> --Thilo
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: More sandbox build woes
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
no objections - sounds good. +1 to graduate it from sandbox and publish
to incubator repo. in next release.
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>
>> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>
>>> - the pear packaging maven plugin project must be built first
>>> and manually if it's not in the local repo yet. I find that
>>> acceptable, but it would be nicer if it wasn't necessary.
>>> If it needs to stay this way, it should be documented.
>>>
>>>
>> The pear packaging plugin is not really useful for external
>> projects because of the burden to build it first.
>>
>> Maybe we can graduate it from the sandbox and publish
>> it to the incubator repo with the next release ?
>>
>> That would also solve the build problem temporary ;-)
>>
>> Jörn
>>
>
> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Objections, anyone?
>
> --Thilo
>
>
>
>
Re: More sandbox build woes
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> - the pear packaging maven plugin project must be built first
>> and manually if it's not in the local repo yet. I find that
>> acceptable, but it would be nicer if it wasn't necessary.
>> If it needs to stay this way, it should be documented.
>>
> The pear packaging plugin is not really useful for external
> projects because of the burden to build it first.
>
> Maybe we can graduate it from the sandbox and publish
> it to the incubator repo with the next release ?
>
> That would also solve the build problem temporary ;-)
>
> Jörn
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Objections, anyone?
--Thilo
Re: More sandbox build woes
Posted by Jörn Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> - the pear packaging maven plugin project must be built first
> and manually if it's not in the local repo yet. I find that
> acceptable, but it would be nicer if it wasn't necessary.
> If it needs to stay this way, it should be documented.
>
The pear packaging plugin is not really useful for external
projects because of the burden to build it first.
Maybe we can graduate it from the sandbox and publish
it to the incubator repo with the next release ?
That would also solve the build problem temporary ;-)
Jörn