You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@commons.apache.org by "Mishkin, Ernest" <er...@mcgraw-hill.com> on 2009/06/29 14:33:42 UTC
RE: [exec] ExecuteWatchdog does not really terminate the "hung" process?
Siegfried,
Should I generate the patches against latest sources or 1.0 - release
sources?
--Ernest
-----Original Message-----
From: Mishkin, Ernest
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:23 AM
To: Commons Users List
Cc: siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at
Subject: **Caution-External**: RE: ExecuteWatchdog does not really
terminate the "hung" process?
I haven't forgotten... Hopefully today.
--Ernest
--------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. reserves the right, subject to applicable local law, to monitor and review the content of any electronic message or information sent to or from McGraw-Hill employee e-mail addresses without informing the sender or recipient of the message.
--------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] ExecuteWatchdog does not really terminate the "hung" process?
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Hi Ernest,
latest source would be nice ... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Mishkin, Ernest wrote:
> Siegfried,
>
> Should I generate the patches against latest sources or 1.0 - release
> sources?
>
> --Ernest
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mishkin, Ernest
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:23 AM
> To: Commons Users List
> Cc: siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at
> Subject: **Caution-External**: RE: ExecuteWatchdog does not really
> terminate the "hung" process?
>
> I haven't forgotten... Hopefully today.
>
> --Ernest
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. reserves the right, subject to applicable local law, to monitor and review the content of any electronic message or information sent to or from McGraw-Hill employee e-mail addresses without informing the sender or recipient of the message.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org