You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> on 2013/02/02 18:29:24 UTC

ANN: The 1st hbase 0.94.5 release candidate is available for download

The 1st 0.94.5 RC is available for download at http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.5-rc0/

Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328

0.94.5 is a bug fix release. This RC has 66 issues resolved against it, contributed by 26 individuals.
These are mostly bug fixes. Also fixed is a long standing bug in replication along with lots of random test failures.

The full list of changes is available here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323874

Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and vote +1/-1 by February 11th on whether we should release this as 0.94.5.

The release testing spreadsheet is here: 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGNTUHVVY1lVZnpPT2Z5b0l2c3RoSHc#gid=0
(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so that we can gauge the coverage)

HBase continues to be actively maintained; changes are coming in at a rate of about two commits per day.
There is no slow down in this RC with 66 commits over the course of about a month.

Thanks.

-- Lars

Re: ANN: The 1st hbase 0.94.5 release candidate is available for download

Posted by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>.

Yeah when the RC is release committing can continue. Sorry forgot to send a note to that regard.

-- Lars



________________________________
 From: Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: ANN: The 1st hbase 0.94.5 release candidate is available for download
 
Lars, on an unrelated note, can we continue to commit on 0.94 branch for
0.94.6? The RC cut is complete I believe.

Ps. this is for HBASE-7748, and HBASE-7770.
Enis


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Auto-detection may be difficult.
> 0.94.5 uses the following config param for usage of multi() feature in
> zookeeper 3.4 :
>
>   <property>
>     <name>hbase.zookeeper.useMulti</name>
>     <value>false</value>
>
> Since the issue HBASE-7771 tries to solve affects zookeeper 3.4.4 and later
> version(s), the above config param would not suffice (for current
> discussion).
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I can easily upgrade to 3.4.5, but I think some might not want to
> > if zookeeper is used by some other applications.
> >
> > So I agree that we should consider something to detect ZK version and
> > decide, based on that, ifthe workaround should be used. And if this
> > can be done automatically instead of setting up something in the conf
> > files, it's even better...
> >
> > 2013/2/5, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> > > This is tricky.
> > > Is it possible to upgrade standalone zookeeper to 3.4.5 when you
> upgrade
> > to
> > > HBase 0.94.5 ?
> > >
> > > Anyway, looks like we need some config parameter that tells us the
> > version
> > > of standalone zookeeper :-) so that we can decide whether the
> workaround
> > > should be used.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Ted,
> > >>
> > >> Does it mean that 0.94.5 will not work anymore for those running
> > >> zookeeper separatly with a version < 3.4.5?
> > >>
> > >> I'm running 3.4.3 in my cluster...
> > >>
> > >> JM
> > >>
> > >> 2013/2/5, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> > >> > Patch is available for:
> > >> > HBASE-7771 Secure HBase Client in MR job causes tasks to wait
> forever
> > >> >
> > >> > It removes the workaround from HBASE-4791 which went into 0.94.4
> > >> >
> > >> > Now that zookeeper 3.4.5 is used by 0.94.5, I think HBASE-7771
> should
> > >> > go
> > >> > into 0.94.5
> > >> >
> > >> > My two cents.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> The 1st 0.94.5 RC is available for download at
> > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.5-rc0/
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 0.94.5 is a bug fix release. This RC has 66 issues resolved against
> > >> >> it,
> > >> >> contributed by 26 individuals.
> > >> >> These are mostly bug fixes. Also fixed is a long standing bug in
> > >> >> replication along with lots of random test failures.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The full list of changes is available here:
> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323874
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc,
> > and
> > >> >> vote +1/-1 by February 11th on whether we should release this as
> > >> >> 0.94.5.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The release testing spreadsheet is here:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGNTUHVVY1lVZnpPT2Z5b0l2c3RoSHc#gid=0
> > >> >> (if you test this release, please add your test to this
> spreadsheet,
> > >> >> so
> > >> >> that we can gauge the coverage)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> HBase continues to be actively maintained; changes are coming in
> at a
> > >> >> rate
> > >> >> of about two commits per day.
> > >> >> There is no slow down in this RC with 66 commits over the course of
> > >> about
> > >> >> a month.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -- Lars
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Re: ANN: The 1st hbase 0.94.5 release candidate is available for download

Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.

Lars, on an unrelated note, can we continue to commit on 0.94 branch for
0.94.6? The RC cut is complete I believe.

Ps. this is for HBASE-7748, and HBASE-7770.
Enis


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Auto-detection may be difficult.
> 0.94.5 uses the following config param for usage of multi() feature in
> zookeeper 3.4 :
>
>   <property>
>     <name>hbase.zookeeper.useMulti</name>
>     <value>false</value>
>
> Since the issue HBASE-7771 tries to solve affects zookeeper 3.4.4 and later
> version(s), the above config param would not suffice (for current
> discussion).
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I can easily upgrade to 3.4.5, but I think some might not want to
> > if zookeeper is used by some other applications.
> >
> > So I agree that we should consider something to detect ZK version and
> > decide, based on that, ifthe workaround should be used. And if this
> > can be done automatically instead of setting up something in the conf
> > files, it's even better...
> >
> > 2013/2/5, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> > > This is tricky.
> > > Is it possible to upgrade standalone zookeeper to 3.4.5 when you
> upgrade
> > to
> > > HBase 0.94.5 ?
> > >
> > > Anyway, looks like we need some config parameter that tells us the
> > version
> > > of standalone zookeeper :-) so that we can decide whether the
> workaround
> > > should be used.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Ted,
> > >>
> > >> Does it mean that 0.94.5 will not work anymore for those running
> > >> zookeeper separatly with a version < 3.4.5?
> > >>
> > >> I'm running 3.4.3 in my cluster...
> > >>
> > >> JM
> > >>
> > >> 2013/2/5, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> > >> > Patch is available for:
> > >> > HBASE-7771 Secure HBase Client in MR job causes tasks to wait
> forever
> > >> >
> > >> > It removes the workaround from HBASE-4791 which went into 0.94.4
> > >> >
> > >> > Now that zookeeper 3.4.5 is used by 0.94.5, I think HBASE-7771
> should
> > >> > go
> > >> > into 0.94.5
> > >> >
> > >> > My two cents.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> The 1st 0.94.5 RC is available for download at
> > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.5-rc0/
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 0.94.5 is a bug fix release. This RC has 66 issues resolved against
> > >> >> it,
> > >> >> contributed by 26 individuals.
> > >> >> These are mostly bug fixes. Also fixed is a long standing bug in
> > >> >> replication along with lots of random test failures.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The full list of changes is available here:
> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323874
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc,
> > and
> > >> >> vote +1/-1 by February 11th on whether we should release this as
> > >> >> 0.94.5.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The release testing spreadsheet is here:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGNTUHVVY1lVZnpPT2Z5b0l2c3RoSHc#gid=0
> > >> >> (if you test this release, please add your test to this
> spreadsheet,
> > >> >> so
> > >> >> that we can gauge the coverage)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> HBase continues to be actively maintained; changes are coming in
> at a
> > >> >> rate
> > >> >> of about two commits per day.
> > >> >> There is no slow down in this RC with 66 commits over the course of
> > >> about
> > >> >> a month.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -- Lars
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Re: ANN: The 1st hbase 0.94.5 release candidate is available for download

Posted by Gary Helmling <gh...@gmail.com>.

I think HBASE-7772 should sink the current RC.  It looks like HBASE-7626
broke token authentication in some cases with secure HBase.


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:

> I do not think we can mandate a newer version of ZK in a minor release. At
> least we avoided that in the past.
> HBase "ships" with ZK 3.4.5, but that really just means the client. It
> still has to work with older ZK servers.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 1:36 PM
> Subject: Re: ANN: The 1st hbase 0.94.5 release candidate is available for
> download
>
> I think it would be prudent to sink RC0.
>
> The fix for HBASE-7771 is shaping up. As long as user deploys 0.94.5 (RC1)
> with zookeeper client of 3.4.4 or newer, there should be no problem.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:31 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > You'd recommend sinking this RC for this rather than having this next
> > months in 0.94.6?
> >
> > I'm fine either way. With many, smaller, and backward compatible releases
> > it should be less important to fix a particular problem in a specific
> > release.
> >
> > Looks like this problem was introduced with 0.94.4, and it that case it
> > might be prudent to get this in.
> >
> > So... Wanna sink this RC?
> >
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 1:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: ANN: The 1st hbase 0.94.5 release candidate is available for
> > download
> >
> > Francis reminded me that ZOOKEEPER-1437 is a client side fix.
> >
> > So our situation is simplified: 0.94.5 ships with zookeeper 3.4.5
> > client. HBASE-7771 should be included.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Auto-detection may be difficult.
> > > 0.94.5 uses the following config param for usage of multi() feature in
> > > zookeeper 3.4 :
> > >
> > >   <property>
> > >     <name>hbase.zookeeper.useMulti</name>
> > >     <value>false</value>
> > >
> > > Since the issue HBASE-7771 tries to solve affects zookeeper 3.4.4 and
> > > later version(s), the above config param would not suffice (for current
> > > discussion).
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Yes, I can easily upgrade to 3.4.5, but I think some might not want to
> > >> if zookeeper is used by some other applications.
> > >>
> > >> So I agree that we should consider something to detect ZK version and
> > >> decide, based on that, ifthe workaround should be used. And if this
> > >> can be done automatically instead of setting up something in the conf
> > >> files, it's even better...
> > >>
> > >> 2013/2/5, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> > >> > This is tricky.
> > >> > Is it possible to upgrade standalone zookeeper to 3.4.5 when you
> > >> upgrade to
> > >> > HBase 0.94.5 ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyway, looks like we need some config parameter that tells us the
> > >> version
> > >> > of standalone zookeeper :-) so that we can decide whether the
> > workaround
> > >> > should be used.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > >> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi Ted,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Does it mean that 0.94.5 will not work anymore for those running
> > >> >> zookeeper separatly with a version < 3.4.5?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I'm running 3.4.3 in my cluster...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> JM
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2013/2/5, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> > >> >> > Patch is available for:
> > >> >> > HBASE-7771 Secure HBase Client in MR job causes tasks to wait
> > forever
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > It removes the workaround from HBASE-4791 which went into 0.94.4
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Now that zookeeper 3.4.5 is used by 0.94.5, I think HBASE-7771
> > should
> > >> >> > go
> > >> >> > into 0.94.5
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > My two cents.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> The 1st 0.94.5 RC is available for download at
> > >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.5-rc0/
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> 0.94.5 is a bug fix release. This RC has 66 issues resolved
> > against
> > >> >> >> it,
> > >> >> >> contributed by 26 individuals.
> > >> >> >> These are mostly bug fixes. Also fixed is a long standing bug in
> > >> >> >> replication along with lots of random test failures.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> The full list of changes is available here:
> > >> >> >>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323874
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin,
> etc,
> > >> and
> > >> >> >> vote +1/-1 by February 11th on whether we should release this as
> > >> >> >> 0.94.5.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> The release testing spreadsheet is here:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGNTUHVVY1lVZnpPT2Z5b0l2c3RoSHc#gid=0
> > >> >> >> (if you test this release, please add your test to this
> > spreadsheet,
> > >> >> >> so
> > >> >> >> that we can gauge the coverage)
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> HBase continues to be actively maintained; changes are coming in
> > at
> > >> a
> > >> >> >> rate
> > >> >> >> of about two commits per day.
> > >> >> >> There is no slow down in this RC with 66 commits over the course
> > of
> > >> >> about
> > >> >> >> a month.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Thanks.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> -- Lars
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>