DIRSERVER-1663 status with txn branch

[Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Hi guys,

I just tested the txn branch agaist the small concurrent access test I 
created last september : it seems that with teh fixes Selcuk has 
injected ino the code, we don't have any more issue !

This is a fantastic news !

Now, that raise a question : should we merge immediately the branch into 
the trunk, or should we finish the ongoing work in the branch ?

Selcuk, what's your opinion on this ?

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Re: DIRSERVER-1663 status with txn branch

[Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Le 3/2/12 4:02 AM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Alex Karasulu<ak...@apache.org>  wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny<el...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I just tested the txn branch agaist the small concurrent access test I
>>> created last september : it seems that with teh fixes Selcuk has injected
>>> ino the code, we don't have any more issue !
>>>
>>> This is a fantastic news !
>>>
>> Yeah nice work guys.
>>
>>> Now, that raise a question : should we merge immediately the branch into
>>> the trunk, or should we finish the ongoing work in the branch ?
>>>
>> It's up to you guys. Might introduce instability but that might make it
>> easier to solidify rapidly and not have to deal with merging.
>>
> I think we should wait until write commit conflict and logical caches
> are handled.

Ok, your call.

We are not in a hurry.

FYI, I conducted some more tests yesterday, and I was *very* pleased by 
the performances. I did a concurrent search with many threads on my 
laptop, and was able to get more than 4500 search/s, which is not bad 
considering that I ran the tester on the same machine. I'm tlking about  
millions search here, as I ran the test for 20 minutes.

>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> -- Alex
>>
> thanks
> Selcuk


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Re: DIRSERVER-1663 status with txn branch

[Selcuk AYA <ay...@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I just tested the txn branch agaist the small concurrent access test I
>> created last september : it seems that with teh fixes Selcuk has injected
>> ino the code, we don't have any more issue !
>>
>> This is a fantastic news !
>>
>
> Yeah nice work guys.
>
>>
>> Now, that raise a question : should we merge immediately the branch into
>> the trunk, or should we finish the ongoing work in the branch ?
>>
>
> It's up to you guys. Might introduce instability but that might make it
> easier to solidify rapidly and not have to deal with merging.
>

I think we should wait until write commit conflict and logical caches
are handled.
> --
> Best Regards,
> -- Alex
>

thanks
Selcuk

Re: DIRSERVER-1663 status with txn branch

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I just tested the txn branch agaist the small concurrent access test I
> created last september : it seems that with teh fixes Selcuk has injected
> ino the code, we don't have any more issue !
>
> This is a fantastic news !
>
>
Yeah nice work guys.


> Now, that raise a question : should we merge immediately the branch into
> the trunk, or should we finish the ongoing work in the branch ?
>
>
It's up to you guys. Might introduce instability but that might make it
easier to solidify rapidly and not have to deal with merging.

-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex

Re: DIRSERVER-1663 status with txn branch

[Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>]

On 1 mars 2012, at 16:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> I just tested the txn branch agaist the small concurrent access test I created last september : it seems that with teh fixes Selcuk has injected ino the code, we don't have any more issue !
> 
> This is a fantastic news !

Awesome news, indeed.


> Now, that raise a question : should we merge immediately the branch into the trunk, or should we finish the ongoing work in the branch ?

I don't know much about the current status of this, but if all integration tests pass, why not?

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

> Selcuk, what's your opinion on this ?
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>