About the new tapestry logo

[liigo <co...@gmail.com>]

All informations was from tapestry's uers' mailing list:

"I do not like the new tapestry logo":

http://www.nabble.com/I-do-not-like-the-new-tapestry-logo-t1619951.html#a4389501

"Re: new logo for Tapestry (just my opinion and my idea pic, don't mad OK)":

http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-new-logo-for-Tapestry-%28just-my-opinion-and-my-idea-pic%2C-don%27t-mad-OK%29-t1634451.html#a4426683

"All proposed logos so far":

http://www.nabble.com/All-proposed-logos-so-far-t1646389.html#a4459317



Comes From:
http://www.nabble.com/Jakarta-Tapestry-f302.html
http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=302&local=y&query=logo

Re: About the new tapestry logo

["com.liigo@gmail.com" <co...@gmail.com>]

We need redesign another one? a much better one?
A good logo is that the most of tapestry's user like. IMO.

在 Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:45:20 +0800，liigo <co...@gmail.com> 写道:

> All informations was from tapestry's users' mailing list:
>
> "I do not like the new tapestry logo":
>
> http://www.nabble.com/I-do-not-like-the-new-tapestry-logo-t1619951.html#a4389501
>
> "Re: new logo for Tapestry (just my opinion and my idea pic, don't mad  
> OK)":
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-new-logo-for-Tapestry-%28just-my-opinion-and-my-idea-pic%2C-don%27t-mad-OK%29-t1634451.html#a4426683
>
> "All proposed logos so far":
>
> http://www.nabble.com/All-proposed-logos-so-far-t1646389.html#a4459317
>
>
>
> Comes From:
> http://www.nabble.com/Jakarta-Tapestry-f302.html
> http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=302&local=y&query=logo




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: About the new tapestry logo

["hv @ Fashion Content" <in...@fashioncontent.com>]

I wish picking a new logo could be done a bit more logically along the lines 
a commercial product would be chosen, before actually voting on the change. 
Coming up with a good logo can take quite a while and rightly so.

I see two possible approches:

1) Make a description of the values & direction of the framework and the 
community in 2-4 sentences.

or

2) Define the primary sort of people you want to appeal to. By this I don't 
mean to say that Tapestry doesn't have a broad appeal, but that tapestry has 
distinguishing features which appeals to certain groups more so than other 
frameworks do.

Once you have a sort of consensus on that it is much easier to make 
suggestions on a logo and much easier to argue merrits of one or the other. 
The must be a couple of professional graphic artists out there that love 
Tapestry, and can come up with some top notch suggestions.

To open it up:

"Tapestry allows you to make and maintain highly interactive web 
sites/applications with no or very little knowledge of Java/J2EE. ..."

I thing Web Designers with strong html/css skills but little server side 
skills are a group that Tapestry can appeal to more so than most other 
solutions.

Henrik 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org