You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commons-dev@ws.apache.org by "Rich Scheuerle (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/09/04 21:58:45 UTC
[jira] Commented: (WSCOMMONS-240) Add a close method to OMNode
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12524847 ]
Rich Scheuerle commented on WSCOMMONS-240:
------------------------------------------
Good ideas.
Some users of Axiom (such as Raymond) only view the OM data via the "Data Model" interfaces.
They don't need to query the underlying builder/parser code, but they do want to indicate that they are "done".
Having a close(boolean) convenience method on OMNode will make it easier for these users to interact with Axiom without
exposing them to other layers of complexity.
I will volunteer to make the changes.
Thanks,
Rich
> Add a close method to OMNode
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: WSCOMMONS-240
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-240
> Project: WS-Commons
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: AXIOM
> Reporter: Raymond Feng
> Assignee: Rich Scheuerle
>
> We're experiencing some memory leaks in AXIOM with some implementations of XML StAX parsers. The main reason is that when an OM tree is backed by a builder or parser, we don't have an API at OM level to release the underlying resources.
> As a user of OM, there are threee cases:
> 1. Immediately close the builder/parser if one exists
> 2. Build the subtree and then close the parser
> 3. Build the entire document and then close the parser
> OMNode already has a method to build itself and its subtree (OMNode.build()).
> Given this information and OM terminology, perhaps the following makes sense.
> /**
> * Close and remove the builder and parser of the OMNode if they exist.
> * @param build. If true the subtree is built prior to closing the builder and parser.
> */
> public void close(boolean build);
> This would satisfy (1) and (2).
> Then if someone needed (3) they can always traverse up to the OMDocument and call close(true).
> Does it make sense? Please advise me a better approach otherwise.
> Thanks,
> Raymond
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org