First release

[Liam Lynch <LL...@idbs.com>]

Hi,

An incipient first release of Amber has been alluded to (on the dev list) - am I right in assuming that will be against OAuth v2.22 (coming from the current trunk) rather than something from the 0.10 branch you've created?

And is there any sense of when that might be out yet? I realise there might be a few hoops to jump through and it might be tricky to say... but if you have a ballpark for that, it would be handy (if not for a release per se for when the code is basically up to v22, that would be really useful).

Many thanks,

Liam Lynch

The information contained in this email may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action on the contents of this information may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system and notify us immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise. IDBS takes no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email and recommends that you subject any incoming E-mail to your own virus checking procedures. We may monitor all E-mail communication through our networks. If you contact us by E-mail, we may store your name and address to facilitate communication.

Re: First release

[Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>]

Hello Antonio, Liam.

I think we have now some nice contributions and a pretty stable code base
for v22.
We need to have our site updated and some patches applied, I'll take a
brief tour on Jira just after this email and try to have some of them
committed.

Having a release is not a problem from a technical point of view, we need
to take care of the copyright thing from Newcastle University (Lukasz,
Maciej, any news on that?)

Tommaso

2011/12/6 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>

> Hi Liam,
>
> I am (only) a potential Amber user as you and I share with you the wish to
> have Amber moving forward towards compliancy with Oauth v22. The (main)
> specification is pretty stable now and is not expected to change too much
> (I hope).
> It would be great if Amber would hit the release in synch with the spec
> (@amber-dev am I asking too much :)?).
>
> Regards
>
> Antonio
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Liam Lynch wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > An incipient first release of Amber has been alluded to (on the dev
> list) - am I right in assuming that will be against OAuth v2.22 (coming
> from the current trunk) rather than something from the 0.10 branch you've
> created?
> >
> > And is there any sense of when that might be out yet? I realise there
> might be a few hoops to jump through and it might be tricky to say... but
> if you have a ballpark for that, it would be handy (if not for a release
> per se for when the code is basically up to v22, that would be really
> useful).
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Liam Lynch
> >
> > The information contained in this email may contain confidential or
> legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action on the contents of
> this information may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error,
> please delete it from your system and notify us immediately. Any views
> expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where
> the message states otherwise. IDBS takes no responsibility for any computer
> virus which might be transferred by way of this email and recommends that
> you subject any incoming E-mail to your own virus checking procedures. We
> may monitor all E-mail communication through our networks. If you contact
> us by E-mail, we may store your name and address to facilitate
> communication.
>
>

Re: First release

[Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>]

Hi Liam,

I am (only) a potential Amber user as you and I share with you the wish to have Amber moving forward towards compliancy with Oauth v22. The (main) specification is pretty stable now and is not expected to change too much (I hope).
It would be great if Amber would hit the release in synch with the spec (@amber-dev am I asking too much :)?).

Regards

Antonio


On Dec 2, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Liam Lynch wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> An incipient first release of Amber has been alluded to (on the dev list) - am I right in assuming that will be against OAuth v2.22 (coming from the current trunk) rather than something from the 0.10 branch you've created?
> 
> And is there any sense of when that might be out yet? I realise there might be a few hoops to jump through and it might be tricky to say... but if you have a ballpark for that, it would be handy (if not for a release per se for when the code is basically up to v22, that would be really useful).
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Liam Lynch
> 
> The information contained in this email may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action on the contents of this information may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system and notify us immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise. IDBS takes no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email and recommends that you subject any incoming E-mail to your own virus checking procedures. We may monitor all E-mail communication through our networks. If you contact us by E-mail, we may store your name and address to facilitate communication.