You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "rahul.soa" <ra...@googlemail.com> on 2010/06/12 22:45:30 UTC

Re: [PATCH] WS-Security - UsernameToken at Server side. Re: [geronimo doc] ws-security at service side

Hello Jarek,

I hope you are doing well.

Can you please review the patch attached on the following JIRA:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4642
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4642>
I modified it a little (replaced the deprecated ContextManager.login(String
realm, CallbackHandler callbackHandler))

Please also take a look at

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5366

when you have time for Axis2/Tomcat part.

Many Thanks,
Rahul


On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:00 PM, rahul.soa <ra...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jarek,
>
> Many Thanks for your support in this.
> Rahul
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rahul,
>>
>> Will do. It was on my todo list but got distracted by bunch of other
>> things. Thanks for looking at it again.
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:21 AM, rahul.soa <ra...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello Jarek/Devs,
>> >
>> > Can you please kindly review this patch?
>> >
>> > Many Thanks,
>> > Rahul
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:35 PM, rahul.soa <ra...@googlemail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dear Devs,
>> >> I hope you are doing well.
>> >> Please comment/apply on the patch "UsernameToken_ServerSide.txt"
>> attached
>> >> here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4642
>> >> I also attached on this email too. Look forward to seeing your
>> comments.
>> >> Many Thanks in advance,
>> >> rahul
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:32 AM, rahul.soa <ra...@googlemail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello Devs/Jarek,
>> >>>
>> >>> I have setup the Server side UsernameToken security in CXF/Jetty
>> against
>> >>> Geronimo-2.2 based on the patches attached here
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4642
>> >>>
>> >>> I have attached the new patch named "UsernameToken_ServerSide.txt" on
>> the
>> >>> above JIRA, please review and apply it. Let me know if you want me to
>> fix
>> >>> something in it.
>> >>>
>> >>> I look forward to seeing your comment on this patch.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Many Thanks,
>> >>> Rahul
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:39 AM, rahul.soa <rahul.soa@googlemail.com
>> >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hello Jeff,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks for your mail.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think code (not all the patches) is not committed yet for the
>> same. I
>> >>>> will try to build latest of Geronimo and will create the same patches
>> (at
>> >>>> lest more simplified) which are not committed from that JIRA.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Many Thanks,
>> >>>> rahul
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:52 AM, chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The document was written based on [1], you may take a look at this
>> JIRA
>> >>>>> for the details.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Anything we should update the doc accordingly, please let us know.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [1]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4642
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Jeff
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:31 AM, rahul.soa <
>> rahul.soa@googlemail.com>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hi Jarek/everyone,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I hope you are doing well.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I am trying to run a sample for securing web-service but that did
>> not
>> >>>>>> work.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I am not sure if this works now
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> "Enabling WS-Security at service side"
>> >>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/securing-web-service.html
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> <servlet>
>> >>>>>> <servlet-name>CalculatorService</servlet-name>
>> >>>>>> <ws-security-binding>
>> >>>>>> <security-realm-name>geronimo-admin</security-realm-name>
>> >>>>>> <property name="wss4j.in.action">UsernameToken</property>
>> >>>>>> </ws-security-binding>
>> >>>>>> </servlet>
>> >>>>>> I don't see the above in the jetty schema.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Or I am missing something? Can you please correct me?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Many Thanks,
>> >>>>>> rahul
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>