You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-dev@ws.apache.org by Jason Brenton <JB...@CYCLOGENESIS.com> on 2000/12/01 23:51:26 UTC

POssible issue parsing ms server response messages.

I wrote before about a White space error recieved on return from a ms asp
listener. I have found it appears that the xerces parser does not have
compatibility with the microsoft returned soap envelope. both a fault and a
contents filled Envelope failed to be parsed, though I can proove that the
MS asp page did generate them in response. Could someone help me fix or
clarify this?

Re: POssible issue parsing ms server response messages.

Posted by Simon Fell <so...@zaks.demon.co.uk>.
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:51:26 -0700 , in soap you wrote:

>I wrote before about a White space error recieved on return from a ms asp
>listener. I have found it appears that the xerces parser does not have
>compatibility with the microsoft returned soap envelope. both a fault and a
>contents filled Envelope failed to be parsed, though I can proove that the
>MS asp page did generate them in response. Could someone help me fix or
>clarify this?

What version of xerces are you using ?, i've been processing SOAP
messages from the MS toolkit with xerces-c 1.2 & 1.3 (and also expat)
without any trouble.

Cheers
Simon

Re: POssible issue parsing ms server response messages.

Posted by Simon Fell <so...@zaks.demon.co.uk>.
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:51:26 -0700 , in soap you wrote:

>I wrote before about a White space error recieved on return from a ms asp
>listener. I have found it appears that the xerces parser does not have
>compatibility with the microsoft returned soap envelope. both a fault and a
>contents filled Envelope failed to be parsed, though I can proove that the
>MS asp page did generate them in response. Could someone help me fix or
>clarify this?

What version of xerces are you using ?, i've been processing SOAP
messages from the MS toolkit with xerces-c 1.2 & 1.3 (and also expat)
without any trouble.

Cheers
Simon