[jira] Closed: (BEEHIVE-867) Enhance JAX-RPC Handler support in the service control

["Nathan Jantz (JIRA)" <de...@beehive.apache.org>]

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-867?page=all ]

Nathan Jantz closed BEEHIVE-867.
--------------------------------


The new method for setting JAX-RPC handlers has been verified using setHandlers(List<HandlerInfo> handlers).   Closing issue.  The following DRT's are passing:

system-controls/test/webservice/webapp/tests/org/apache/beehive/controls/system/webservice/units/doclitwrapped/schematypes/HandlerDocLitEndpointTest
and
system-controls/test/webservice/webapp/tests/org/apache/beehive/controls/system/webservice/units/rpcenc/schematypes/HandlerRpcEncEndpointTest

verified with svn rev 424033



 
 

> Enhance JAX-RPC Handler support in the service control
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEEHIVE-867
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-867
>             Project: Beehive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: System Controls
>            Reporter: Chad Schoettger
>         Assigned To: Nathan Jantz
>
> This proposal has been discussed on the beehive dev list, for reference: 
> Date: Jul 27, 2005 
> Title: Design proposal for enhanced JAX-RPC handler functionality for the service control
> One of the primary goals of this change would be to allow service control users to define their own JAX-RPC handler chains for a service control. Currently the service control only supports the HeaderHandler (see source tree) which can add SOAP headers to outgoing messages and SOAP retrieve headers from incoming messages. There are two service control API's which support this: Element[] getInputHeaders() and void setOutputHeaders(Element[])
> I propose that these two API's be removed as well as the HeaderHandler class.
> The API's would be replaced with a new annotation in the ServiceControl interface:
>     public @interface HandlerConfigParams {
>         String name();
>         String value();
>     }
>     public @interface MessageHandler {
>         Class handlerClass();
>         HandlerConfigParams[] configParams() default {};
>         String[] headers() default {};
>     }
>    
>     @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
>     @Target({ElementType.TYPE})
>     public @interface MessageHandlers {
>         MessageHandler[] value();
>     }
> If this optional annotation is set service control would add the handlers to the HandlerRegistry at runtime.  I'm thinking this would be a class-level annotation for the service control - would it also be useful to be able to define this on a per method basis?
>   

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira