You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> on 2009/07/06 17:06:14 UTC
A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
this "shootout".
The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in
some cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
Interesting, I never realized there was lucene-java-dev@apache.org .
My thoughts are on http://www.jroller.com/otis/entry/open_source_search_engine_benchmark (and in several comments in the blog itself).
Otis
----- Original Message ----
> From: Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>
> To: lucene-java-dev@apache.org
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 11:06:14 AM
> Subject: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
>
> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
>
> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
> this "shootout".
> The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in
> some cases.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
Posted by John Wang <jo...@gmail.com>.
mg4j is a nice project. It is missing the incremental aspects as well.The
"older" paper this experiment mentioned contains lucene-mg4j comparisons.
-John
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd say out of these libraries only Lucene and Sphinx are worth mentioning.
>
> There's also MG4J, which wasn't covered and has a nice algorithmic
> background.
> Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 00:39, John Wang<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Vik did a very nice job.
> > One thing the experiment did not mention is that Lucene handles
> incremental
> > updates, whereas many of the other "competitors" do not. So the indexing
> > performance comparison is not really fair.
> > -John
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
> >>
> >> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
> >> this "shootout".
> >> The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in
> >> some cases.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Kirill Zakharenko/������ ��������� (earwin@gmail.com)
> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
> ICQ: 104465785
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
Posted by eks dev <ek...@yahoo.co.uk>.
> Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
Minion (https://minion.dev.java.net/)
----- Original Message ----
> From: Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com>
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 6 July, 2009 23:01:52
> Subject: Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
>
> I'd say out of these libraries only Lucene and Sphinx are worth mentioning.
>
> There's also MG4J, which wasn't covered and has a nice algorithmic background.
> Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 00:39, John Wangwrote:
> > Vik did a very nice job.
> > One thing the experiment did not mention is that Lucene handles incremental
> > updates, whereas many of the other "competitors" do not. So the indexing
> > performance comparison is not really fair.
> > -John
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
> >>
> >> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
> >> this "shootout".
> >> The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in
> >> some cases.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
> ICQ: 104465785
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
>From the website of Hounder:
How does Hounder compare to Lucene?
Lucene is a full text search library, intended to be a basic building block
for applications needing text search functionality. Hounder, while it uses
Lucene, is a search engine, providing all the required components to gather
and find information with minimum extra coding, and often, no coding at all.
So it is like Solr or Nutch a "search server"/"framework" (or whatever)
around Lucene.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
_____
From: Jorge Handl [mailto:jhandl@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:02 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
http://hounder.org
Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
Posted by Jorge Handl <jh...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
>
http://hounder.org
Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
Posted by Earwin Burrfoot <ea...@gmail.com>.
I'd say out of these libraries only Lucene and Sphinx are worth mentioning.
There's also MG4J, which wasn't covered and has a nice algorithmic background.
Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 00:39, John Wang<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vik did a very nice job.
> One thing the experiment did not mention is that Lucene handles incremental
> updates, whereas many of the other "competitors" do not. So the indexing
> performance comparison is not really fair.
> -John
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
>>
>> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
>> this "shootout".
>> The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in
>> some cases.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
--
Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
ICQ: 104465785
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
Posted by John Wang <jo...@gmail.com>.
Vik did a very nice job.One thing the experiment did not mention is that
Lucene handles incremental updates, whereas many of the other "competitors"
do not. So the indexing performance comparison is not really fair.
-John
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
>
> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
> this "shootout".
> The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in
> some cases.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>