You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@spamassassin.apache.org by bi...@apache.org on 2022/02/21 16:41:15 UTC
svn commit: r1898279 - /spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/billcole/80_test.cf
Author: billcole
Date: Mon Feb 21 16:41:15 2022
New Revision: 1898279
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1898279&view=rev
Log:
no need to limit something with 0 FPs
Modified:
spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/billcole/80_test.cf
Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/billcole/80_test.cf
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/billcole/80_test.cf?rev=1898279&r1=1898278&r2=1898279&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/billcole/80_test.cf (original)
+++ spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/billcole/80_test.cf Mon Feb 21 16:41:15 2022
@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ rawbody T_SCC_HTML_OBJOBJ /< *object +
describe SCC_ISEMM_LID_1 Fingerprint of a particular spammer using an old spamware
header SCC_ISEMM_LID_1 X-Mailer-LID =~ /54,55,56,58,53/
-score SCC_ISEMM_LID_1 2.0 #limit
tflags SCC_ISEMM_LID_1 publish
# TESTING a few domains that are in our "suspicious" list but are known to have some good senders