You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> on 2018/04/18 18:35:39 UTC
[VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Hi all,
I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June 2018
release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major version
bump due to semantic versioning.
2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior to
1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
move faster.
One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling upgrade
path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't been
updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest message
format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
functionality.
Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss more
if needed (of course).
Ismael
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c933281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com>.
+1. Thanks Ismael!
Guozhang
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Matthias J. Sax <ma...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 4/24/18 4:21 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > > +1 Thanks Ismael.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:01 AM, Thomas Crayford <
> > tcrayford@salesforce.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding). Whilst 1.0 -> 2.0 seems like visibly a "big" jump in
> > >> version numbers to have so soon after 1.0, it makes sense with semver
> > >> requirements and the deprecations contained.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> Tom Crayford
> > >> Heroku Kafka
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, zhenya Sun <to...@126.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> no-binding。 +1
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> from my iphone！
> > >>> On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
> > >>> +1 (non-binding).
> > >>> Thx Ismael
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 (non-binding). TY!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> > >>>> vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks Ismael.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --Vahid
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > >>>>>> Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> > >>>> manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> > >>>>>> )
> > >>>>>> escribió:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > >>>>>>> stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <
> > >> gwen@confluent.io>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <
> > >>> ismael@juma.me.uk
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I started a discussion last year about bumping the version
> > >> of
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>> June
> > >>>>>>>>> 2018
> > >>>>>>>>>> release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the
> > >> original
> > >>>>>> post:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires
> > >> a
> > >>>>> major
> > >>>>>>>>> version
> > >>>>>>>>>> bump due to semantic versioning.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
> > >>>> deprecated
> > >>>>>>> prior
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
> > >>>> that
> > >>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>> move faster.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> > >>>>> rolling
> > >>>>>>>>> upgrade
> > >>>>>>>>>> path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala
> > >> clients
> > >>>>>> haven't
> > >>>>>>>> been
> > >>>>>>>>>> updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
> > >>>> latest
> > >>>>>>>> message
> > >>>>>>>>>> format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with
> > >>> no
> > >>>>>> loss
> > >>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>> functionality.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive
> > >>> during
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we
> > >>> can
> > >>>>>>> discuss
> > >>>>>>>>> more
> > >>>>>>>>>> if needed (of course).
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Ismael
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > >>>>> apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > >>>>> &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> > >>>>> kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
> > >>>> lBt342M2PM_
> > >>>>> 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> *Gwen Shapira*
> > >>>>>>>>> Product Manager | Confluent
> > >>>>>>>>> 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > >>>>>>>>> Follow us: Twitter <
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> > >>>>> twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > >>>> siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > >>>>> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > >>>>> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > >>>>>>> | blog
> > >>>>>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> > >>>>> confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> > >>>>> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-
> > >> ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > >>>>> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
-- Guozhang
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Matthias J. Sax <ma...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 4/24/18 4:21 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > +1 Thanks Ismael.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:01 AM, Thomas Crayford <
> tcrayford@salesforce.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding). Whilst 1.0 -> 2.0 seems like visibly a "big" jump in
> >> version numbers to have so soon after 1.0, it makes sense with semver
> >> requirements and the deprecations contained.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Tom Crayford
> >> Heroku Kafka
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, zhenya Sun <to...@126.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> no-binding。 +1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> from my iphone！
> >>> On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
> >>> +1 (non-binding).
> >>> Thx Ismael
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (non-binding). TY!
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> >>>> vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks Ismael.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --Vahid
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> >>>>>> Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> >>>> manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> >>>>>> )
> >>>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> >>>>>>> stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <
> >> gwen@confluent.io>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <
> >>> ismael@juma.me.uk
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I started a discussion last year about bumping the version
> >> of
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> June
> >>>>>>>>> 2018
> >>>>>>>>>> release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the
> >> original
> >>>>>> post:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires
> >> a
> >>>>> major
> >>>>>>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>> bump due to semantic versioning.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
> >>>> deprecated
> >>>>>>> prior
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
> >>>> that
> >>>>>> we
> >>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>> move faster.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> >>>>> rolling
> >>>>>>>>> upgrade
> >>>>>>>>>> path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala
> >> clients
> >>>>>> haven't
> >>>>>>>> been
> >>>>>>>>>> updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
> >>>> latest
> >>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>> format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with
> >>> no
> >>>>>> loss
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> functionality.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive
> >>> during
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we
> >>> can
> >>>>>>> discuss
> >>>>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>>>>> if needed (of course).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Ismael
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> >>>>> apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> >>>>> &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> >>>>> kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
> >>>> lBt342M2PM_
> >>>>> 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> *Gwen Shapira*
> >>>>>>>>> Product Manager | Confluent
> >>>>>>>>> 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> >>>>>>>>> Follow us: Twitter <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> >>>>> twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> >>>> siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> >>>>> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> >>>>> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> >>>>>>> | blog
> >>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> >>>>> confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> >>>>> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-
> >> ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> >>>>> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by "Matthias J. Sax" <ma...@confluent.io>.
+1
On 4/24/18 4:21 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> +1 Thanks Ismael.
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:01 AM, Thomas Crayford <tc...@salesforce.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding). Whilst 1.0 -> 2.0 seems like visibly a "big" jump in
>> version numbers to have so soon after 1.0, it makes sense with semver
>> requirements and the deprecations contained.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tom Crayford
>> Heroku Kafka
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, zhenya Sun <to...@126.com> wrote:
>>
>>> no-binding。 +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> from my iphone！
>>> On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>> Thx Ismael
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding). TY!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
>>>> vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Ismael.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Vahid
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>>>>>> Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
>>>> manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
>>>>>> )
>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
>>>>>>> stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <
>> gwen@confluent.io>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <
>>> ismael@juma.me.uk
>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I started a discussion last year about bumping the version
>> of
>>>> the
>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>> 2018
>>>>>>>>>> release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the
>> original
>>>>>> post:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires
>> a
>>>>> major
>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>> bump due to semantic versioning.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
>>>> deprecated
>>>>>>> prior
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
>>>> that
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> move faster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
>>>>> rolling
>>>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>>>> path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala
>> clients
>>>>>> haven't
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>> updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
>>>> latest
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>> format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with
>>> no
>>>>>> loss
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive
>>> during
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we
>>> can
>>>>>>> discuss
>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> if needed (of course).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ismael
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
>>>>> apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
>>>>> &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
>>>>> kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
>>>> lBt342M2PM_
>>>>> 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> *Gwen Shapira*
>>>>>>>>> Product Manager | Confluent
>>>>>>>>> 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
>>>>>>>>> Follow us: Twitter <
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
>>>>> twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
>>>> siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
>>>>> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
>>>>> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
>>>>>>> | blog
>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
>>>>> confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
>>>>> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-
>> ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
>>>>> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>.
+1 Thanks Ismael.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:01 AM, Thomas Crayford <tc...@salesforce.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Whilst 1.0 -> 2.0 seems like visibly a "big" jump in
> version numbers to have so soon after 1.0, it makes sense with semver
> requirements and the deprecations contained.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom Crayford
> Heroku Kafka
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, zhenya Sun <to...@126.com> wrote:
>
> > no-binding。 +1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > from my iphone！
> > On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding).
> > Thx Ismael
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding). TY!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> > > vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Ismael.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Vahid
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> > > > >
> > > > > El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> > > manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> > > > >)
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > > > > > stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <
> gwen@confluent.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <
> > ismael@juma.me.uk
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > June
> > > > > > > > 2018
> > > > > > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the
> original
> > > > > post:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires
> a
> > > > major
> > > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
> > > deprecated
> > > > > > prior
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
> > > that
> > > > > we
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > move faster.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> > > > rolling
> > > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala
> clients
> > > > > haven't
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
> > > latest
> > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with
> > no
> > > > > loss
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > functionality.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive
> > during
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we
> > can
> > > > > > discuss
> > > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > > > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > > > &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> > > > kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
> > > lBt342M2PM_
> > > > 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> > > > >
> > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> > > > twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > > siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > > > xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > > > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > > > > > | blog
> > > > > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> > > > confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> > > > itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-
> ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > > > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Thomas Crayford <tc...@salesforce.com>.
+1 (non-binding). Whilst 1.0 -> 2.0 seems like visibly a "big" jump in
version numbers to have so soon after 1.0, it makes sense with semver
requirements and the deprecations contained.
Thanks
Tom Crayford
Heroku Kafka
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, zhenya Sun <to...@126.com> wrote:
> no-binding。 +1
>
>
>
>
>
> from my iphone！
> On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
> Thx Ismael
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding). TY!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> > >
> > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> > vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Ismael.
> > > >
> > > > --Vahid
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > > Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> > > >
> > > > El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> > manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> > > >)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > > > > stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <
> ismael@juma.me.uk
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of
> > the
> > > > > June
> > > > > > > 2018
> > > > > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
> > > > post:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a
> > > major
> > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
> > deprecated
> > > > > prior
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
> > that
> > > > we
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > > move faster.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> > > rolling
> > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
> > > > haven't
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
> > latest
> > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with
> no
> > > > loss
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > functionality.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive
> during
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we
> can
> > > > > discuss
> > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > > &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> > > kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
> > lBt342M2PM_
> > > 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> > > >
> > > > > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> > > twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > > xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > > > > | blog
> > > > > > > <
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> > > confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> > > itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Viktor Somogyi <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Ismael
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:20 PM, zhenya Sun <to...@126.com> wrote:
> no-binding。 +1
>
>
>
>
>
> from my iphone！
> On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
> Thx Ismael
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding). TY!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> > >
> > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> > vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Ismael.
> > > >
> > > > --Vahid
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > > Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> > > >
> > > > El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> > manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> > > >)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > > > > stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <
> ismael@juma.me.uk
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of
> > the
> > > > > June
> > > > > > > 2018
> > > > > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
> > > > post:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a
> > > major
> > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
> > deprecated
> > > > > prior
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
> > that
> > > > we
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > > move faster.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> > > rolling
> > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
> > > > haven't
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
> > latest
> > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with
> no
> > > > loss
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > functionality.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive
> during
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we
> can
> > > > > discuss
> > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > > &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> > > kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
> > lBt342M2PM_
> > > 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> > > >
> > > > > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> > > twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > > xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > > > > | blog
> > > > > > > <
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> > > confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> > > itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by zhenya Sun <to...@126.com>.
no-binding。 +1
from my iphone！
On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
+1 (non-binding).
Thx Ismael
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). TY!
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding).
> > >
> > > Thanks Ismael.
> > >
> > > --Vahid
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> > >
> > > El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > > > stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of
> the
> > > > June
> > > > > > 2018
> > > > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
> > > post:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a
> > major
> > > > > > version
> > > > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
> deprecated
> > > > prior
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
> that
> > > we
> > > > can
> > > > > > > move faster.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> > rolling
> > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
> > > haven't
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
> latest
> > > > > message
> > > > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no
> > > loss
> > > > of
> > > > > > > functionality.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during
> > > the
> > > > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can
> > > > discuss
> > > > > > more
> > > > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> > kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
> lBt342M2PM_
> > 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> > >
> > > > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> > twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > > > | blog
> > > > > > <
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> > confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> > itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Sandor Murakozi <sm...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding).
Thx Ismael
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). TY!
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding).
> > >
> > > Thanks Ismael.
> > >
> > > --Vahid
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> > >
> > > El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > > > stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of
> the
> > > > June
> > > > > > 2018
> > > > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
> > > post:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a
> > major
> > > > > > version
> > > > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
> deprecated
> > > > prior
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
> that
> > > we
> > > > can
> > > > > > > move faster.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> > rolling
> > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
> > > haven't
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
> latest
> > > > > message
> > > > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no
> > > loss
> > > > of
> > > > > > > functionality.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during
> > > the
> > > > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can
> > > > discuss
> > > > > > more
> > > > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> > kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
> lBt342M2PM_
> > 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> > >
> > > > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> > twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > > > | blog
> > > > > > <
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> > confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> > itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Matt Farmer <ma...@frmr.me>.
+1 (non-binding). TY!
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <va...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > Thanks Ismael.
> >
> > --Vahid
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> >
> > El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding).
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > > stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > > >
> > > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the
> > > June
> > > > > 2018
> > > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
> > post:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a
> major
> > > > > version
> > > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated
> > > prior
> > > > to
> > > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that
> > we
> > > can
> > > > > > move faster.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> rolling
> > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
> > haven't
> > > > been
> > > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> > > > message
> > > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no
> > loss
> > > of
> > > > > > functionality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during
> > the
> > > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can
> > > discuss
> > > > > more
> > > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=lBt342M2PM_
> 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> >
> > > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > > | blog
> > > > > <
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by tao xiao <xi...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding. thx Ismael
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <va...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks Ismael.
>
> --Vahid
>
>
>
> From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
>
>
>
> +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
>
> El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<ma...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > >
> > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the
> > June
> > > > 2018
> > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
> post:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
> > > > version
> > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated
> > prior
> > > to
> > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that
> we
> > can
> > > > > move faster.
> > > > >
> > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
> > > > upgrade
> > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
> haven't
> > > been
> > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> > > message
> > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no
> loss
> > of
> > > > > functionality.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during
> the
> > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can
> > discuss
> > > > more
> > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > >
> > > > > Ismael
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=lBt342M2PM_4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
>
> > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > Follow us: Twitter <
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > | blog
> > > > <
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Vahid S Hashemian <va...@us.ibm.com>.
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks Ismael.
--Vahid
From: Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: 04/19/2018 07:32 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
+1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<ma...@gmail.com>)
escribió:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> >
> > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the
> June
> > > 2018
> > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
post:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
> > > version
> > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated
> prior
> > to
> > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that
we
> can
> > > > move faster.
> > > >
> > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
> > > upgrade
> > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
haven't
> > been
> > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> > message
> > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no
loss
> of
> > > > functionality.
> > > >
> > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during
the
> > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can
> discuss
> > > more
> > > > if needed (of course).
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=lBt342M2PM_4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > Follow us: Twitter <
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> | blog
> > > <
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <qu...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<ma...@gmail.com>)
escribió:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> >
> > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the
> June
> > > 2018
> > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
> > > version
> > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated
> prior
> > to
> > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we
> can
> > > > move faster.
> > > >
> > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
> > > upgrade
> > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't
> > been
> > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> > message
> > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss
> of
> > > > functionality.
> > > >
> > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can
> discuss
> > > more
> > > > if needed (of course).
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Manikumar <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
>
> On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June
> > 2018
> > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
> > >
> > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
> > version
> > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > >
> > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior
> to
> > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> > > move faster.
> > >
> > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
> > upgrade
> > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't
> been
> > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> message
> > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> > > functionality.
> > >
> > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss
> > more
> > > if needed (of course).
> > >
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Gwen Shapira*
> > Product Manager | Confluent
> > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Stephane Maarek <st...@simplemachines.com.au>.
+1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June
> 2018
> > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
> >
> > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
> version
> > bump due to semantic versioning.
> >
> > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior to
> > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> > move faster.
> >
> > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
> upgrade
> > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't been
> > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest message
> > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> > functionality.
> >
> > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss
> more
> > if needed (of course).
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Gwen Shapira*
> Product Manager | Confluent
> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>.
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June 2018
> release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
>
> 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major version
> bump due to semantic versioning.
>
> 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior to
> 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> move faster.
>
> One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling upgrade
> path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't been
> updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest message
> format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> functionality.
>
> Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss more
> if needed (of course).
>
> Ismael
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
>
--
*Gwen Shapira*
Product Manager | Confluent
650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
<http://www.confluent.io/blog>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>.
Thanks to everyone who voted. The vote passed with the following votes:
* 6 binding +1s: Rajini, Gwen, Jason, Matthias, Guozhang, myself
* 16 non-binding +1s: Ted, Edoardo, Jakub, Bill, Rahul, Mickael, Stephane,
Manikumar, Jorge, Vahid, Tao, Matt, Sandor, Zhenya, Viktor, Thomas
* No +0, -0 or -1 votes
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June
> 2018 release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
>
> 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major version
> bump due to semantic versioning.
>
> 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior to
> 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> move faster.
>
> One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling upgrade
> path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't been
> updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest message
> format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> functionality.
>
> Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss more
> if needed (of course).
>
> Ismael
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Mickael Maison <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non binding), thanks
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Rahul Singh
<ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Apr 18, 2018, 5:12 PM -0500, Bill Bejeck <bb...@gmail.com>, wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Edoardo Comar <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> > thanks Ismael
>> >
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Edoardo Comar
>> >
>> > IBM Message Hub
>> >
>> > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Rajini Sivaram <rajinisivaram@gmail.com
>> > To: dev <dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > Date: 18/04/2018 22:05
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Ismael, Thanks for following this up.
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Rajini
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > > -------- Original message --------From: Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk
>> > > Date: 4/18/18 11:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev <dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > > Subject: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June
>> > 2018
>> > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
>> > >
>> > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
>> > version
>> > > bump due to semantic versioning.
>> > >
>> > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior
>> > to
>> > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
>> > > move faster.
>> > >
>> > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
>> > upgrade
>> > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't
>> > been
>> > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
>> > message
>> > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
>> > > functionality.
>> > >
>> > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
>> > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss
>> > more
>> > > if needed (of course).
>> > >
>> > > Ismael
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> > >
>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
>> > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
>> > &d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0
>> > OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=JJocxOdv9dM3JXFwj2wYoHmVn9uDo5LSaIpu2MFZf3E&s=
>> > cVke94qmd9h7EH2TscT6aiaT9bMkdiPc4Vr9AVLwxrQ&e=
>> >
>> > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Unless stated otherwise above:
>> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> > 741598.
>> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>> >
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Rahul Singh <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Apr 18, 2018, 5:12 PM -0500, Bill Bejeck <bb...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Edoardo Comar <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > thanks Ismael
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Edoardo Comar
> >
> > IBM Message Hub
> >
> > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Rajini Sivaram <rajinisivaram@gmail.com
> > To: dev <dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 18/04/2018 22:05
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Ismael, Thanks for following this up.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajini
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > -------- Original message --------From: Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk
> > > Date: 4/18/18 11:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev <dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June
> > 2018
> > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
> > >
> > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
> > version
> > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > >
> > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior
> > to
> > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> > > move faster.
> > >
> > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
> > upgrade
> > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't
> > been
> > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> > message
> > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> > > functionality.
> > >
> > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss
> > more
> > > if needed (of course).
> > >
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > &d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0
> > OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=JJocxOdv9dM3JXFwj2wYoHmVn9uDo5LSaIpu2MFZf3E&s=
> > cVke94qmd9h7EH2TscT6aiaT9bMkdiPc4Vr9AVLwxrQ&e=
> >
> > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
> >
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Bill Bejeck <bb...@gmail.com>.
+1
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Edoardo Comar <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> thanks Ismael
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Edoardo Comar
>
> IBM Message Hub
>
> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>
>
>
> From: Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>
> To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> Date: 18/04/2018 22:05
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
>
>
>
> Hi Ismael, Thanks for following this up.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > -------- Original message --------From: Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > Date: 4/18/18 11:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> > Subject: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June
> 2018
> > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
> >
> > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
> version
> > bump due to semantic versioning.
> >
> > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior
> to
> > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> > move faster.
> >
> > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
> upgrade
> > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't
> been
> > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> message
> > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> > functionality.
> >
> > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss
> more
> > if needed (of course).
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> &d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0
> OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=JJocxOdv9dM3JXFwj2wYoHmVn9uDo5LSaIpu2MFZf3E&s=
> cVke94qmd9h7EH2TscT6aiaT9bMkdiPc4Vr9AVLwxrQ&e=
>
> > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> >
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>.
+1 (non-binding) ... I think that both points make lot of sense.
Jakub
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Edoardo Comar <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> thanks Ismael
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Edoardo Comar
>
> IBM Message Hub
>
> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>
>
>
> From: Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>
> To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> Date: 18/04/2018 22:05
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
>
>
>
> Hi Ismael, Thanks for following this up.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > -------- Original message --------From: Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > Date: 4/18/18 11:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> > Subject: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June
> 2018
> > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
> >
> > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
> version
> > bump due to semantic versioning.
> >
> > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior
> to
> > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> > move faster.
> >
> > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
> upgrade
> > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't
> been
> > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> message
> > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> > functionality.
> >
> > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss
> more
> > if needed (of course).
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> &d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0
> OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=JJocxOdv9dM3JXFwj2wYoHmVn9uDo5LSaIpu2MFZf3E&s=
> cVke94qmd9h7EH2TscT6aiaT9bMkdiPc4Vr9AVLwxrQ&e=
>
> > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> >
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Edoardo Comar <EC...@uk.ibm.com>.
thanks Ismael
+1 (non-binding)
--------------------------------------------------
Edoardo Comar
IBM Message Hub
IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
From: Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>
To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org>
Date: 18/04/2018 22:05
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Hi Ismael, Thanks for following this up.
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Rajini
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> -------- Original message --------From: Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> Date: 4/18/18 11:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> Hi all,
>
> I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June
2018
> release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
>
> 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major
version
> bump due to semantic versioning.
>
> 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior
to
> 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> move faster.
>
> One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling
upgrade
> path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't
been
> updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
message
> format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> functionality.
>
> Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss
more
> if needed (of course).
>
> Ismael
>
> [1]
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=JJocxOdv9dM3JXFwj2wYoHmVn9uDo5LSaIpu2MFZf3E&s=cVke94qmd9h7EH2TscT6aiaT9bMkdiPc4Vr9AVLwxrQ&e=
> 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
>
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ismael, Thanks for following this up.
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Rajini
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> -------- Original message --------From: Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> Date: 4/18/18 11:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> Hi all,
>
> I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June 2018
> release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
>
> 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major version
> bump due to semantic versioning.
>
> 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior to
> 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
> move faster.
>
> One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling upgrade
> path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't been
> updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest message
> format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
> functionality.
>
> Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
> discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss more
> if needed (of course).
>
> Ismael
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
>
Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
+1
-------- Original message --------From: Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> Date: 4/18/18 11:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Hi all,
I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June 2018
release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post:
1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major version
bump due to semantic versioning.
2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior to
1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can
move faster.
One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling upgrade
path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't been
updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest message
format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of
functionality.
Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the
discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss more
if needed (of course).
Ismael
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c933281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E