You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ratis.apache.org by Yaolong Liu <dr...@apache.org> on 2022/11/11 14:14:34 UTC

[VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.4.1 rc1

Hi all,


I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis Release 2.4.1 rc1.

Compared to rc0, rc1 adds RATIS-1741 to fix some UT issues.


The git tag to be voted upon:


https://github.com/apache/ratis/tree/ratis-2.4.1-rc1


The git commit hash:


3d546aeba9730a68bf433f166aa76c3fd68c5584


The source and binary tarballs can be found at:


https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/2.4.1/rc1


Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with:


444D 29C9 DEEF A0E7 3D90 4BA5 2973 DD33 3371 E759


My public key to verify signatures can be found in:


https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/KEYS


Maven artifacts are staged at:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1133/


This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.


    [ ] +1 approve


    [ ] +0 no opinion


    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)


Starting with my +1 (binding):


 * Verified checksum, signature, git hash


 * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE


 * Compared source tarball to repo at the given tag


 * Built from source


 * Ran regular Ratis CI [1]


Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.


-Yaolong


[1] https://github.com/codings-dan/incubator-ratis/actions/runs/3445385979

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.4.1 rc1

Posted by Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com>.




This vote is closed due to the need to merge RATIS-1743 to fix the OOM issue




-Yaolong





At 2022-11-17 15:32:17, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Yaolong,
>
>Let's include RATIS-1743 but not RATIS-1746.  Thanks a lot for bringing
>this up!
>
>Tsz-Wo
>
>On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:55 PM Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tsz-Wo,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.4.1 rc1

Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.

Hi Yaolong,

Let's include RATIS-1743 but not RATIS-1746.  Thanks a lot for bringing
this up!

Tsz-Wo

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:55 PM Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com> wrote:

> Hi Tsz-Wo,
>
>
> I found that RATIS-1743 and RATIS-1746 try fix metric OOM related issues,
> should we merge them into branch-2,
> and then launch a new round of release？
>
>
> -Yaolong
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2022-11-12 14:02:23, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >+1
> >
> >- Verified all checksums and signatures.
> >- Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
> >- Compared the files in the src tarball with the files in git.
> >- Built from source successfully.
> >- Passed all unit tests.
> >- Able to run examples and shell with the bin tarball.
> >
> >Thanks a lot for driving this!
> >
> >Tsz-Wo
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.4.1 rc1

Posted by Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com>.

Hi Tsz-Wo,


I found that RATIS-1743 and RATIS-1746 try fix metric OOM related issues, should we merge them into branch-2, 
and then launch a new round of release？


-Yaolong














At 2022-11-12 14:02:23, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1
>
>- Verified all checksums and signatures.
>- Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
>- Compared the files in the src tarball with the files in git.
>- Built from source successfully.
>- Passed all unit tests.
>- Able to run examples and shell with the bin tarball.
>
>Thanks a lot for driving this!
>
>Tsz-Wo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.4.1 rc1

Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.

+1

- Verified all checksums and signatures.
- Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
- Compared the files in the src tarball with the files in git.
- Built from source successfully.
- Passed all unit tests.
- Able to run examples and shell with the bin tarball.

Thanks a lot for driving this!

Tsz-Wo

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 7:48 AM William Song <sz...@163.com> wrote:

> Thanks Yaolong for working on this!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Verified git hash
> * Built Ratis from source
> * Built IoTDB using rc1 and passed regular CI
>
> William
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.4.1 rc1

Posted by William Song <sz...@163.com>.

Thanks Yaolong for working on this!

+1 (non-binding)

* Verified git hash
* Built Ratis from source
* Built IoTDB using rc1 and passed regular CI

William