You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@axis.apache.org by "Fred Preston (JIRA)" <ax...@ws.apache.org> on 2006/04/05 14:26:14 UTC

[jira] Commented: (AXISCPP-930) Chunked encoding is not implemented correctly

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-930?page=comments#action_12373297 ] 

Fred Preston commented on AXISCPP-930:
--------------------------------------

Hi,
Is this still a problem?  If so, can I have specific examples with WSDLs and TCP monitor output so I can attempt to track this down.

Regards,

Fred Preston.

> Chunked encoding is not implemented correctly
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: AXISCPP-930
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-930
>      Project: Axis-C++
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Transport (axis2), Transport (axis3)
>     Versions: 1.5 Final
>  Environment: Solaris 8
>     Reporter: Michael Dufel

>
> <Rant>The chunked transfer encoding is broken and results in a 'peekNextChar' error  similar to the one described in AXISCPP-555. I was forced to re-write HTTPTransport::getBytes() from almost the ground up because of the unreadableness of the code. Nested do/while loops??? Come on ... Yes I know, I am a code snob. </Rant> 
> I believe the problem in the original code was reflected in the case that the buffer from the channel contains data in the following form:
> <some continued data>CRLF
> <chunk length 1>CRLF
> <some data 1><CRLF>
> <chunk length 2>CRLF
> <some data 2>CRLF
> .
> .
> .
> <chunk length n>CRLF
> <some data n>
> everything after <chunk length 2> was being dropped by the transport library. The transport library sends a 'TRANSPORT FINISHED' response and the xml parser is only given a partial message to deal with. This causes the 'peekNextChar' error. 
> Yes, I know that solaris 8 is not supported in Axis 1.5, but this is a protocol issue, not a platform related issue. Again, since I had to re-write the getBytes method, I can't offer a code snippet which will 'magically' fix this problem. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira