You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by mosermw <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/06/05 21:47:44 UTC

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2748: NIFI-4272 ReplaceText support multiple captures whe...

Github user mosermw commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2748#discussion_r193232920
  
    --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestReplaceText.java ---
    @@ -1074,12 +1090,11 @@ public void testRegexWithBadCaptureGroup() throws IOException {
             runner.setProperty(ReplaceText.REPLACEMENT_STRATEGY, ReplaceText.REGEX_REPLACE);
             runner.setProperty(ReplaceText.EVALUATION_MODE, ReplaceText.ENTIRE_TEXT);
     
    +        exception.expect(AssertionError.class);
    +        exception.expectMessage("java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: No group 1");
    --- End diff --
    
    At first I was really concerned about this change to IndexOutOfBoundsException, because it means the flowfile will rollback and admin yield the ReplaceText.  But if this is simply verifying behavior when the SEARCH_VALUE is incorrectly configured, then I think this is OK.  Can you confirm?  Normally we would prefer a customValidate() method catch this scenario (REPLACEMENT_VALUE references a capture group that does exist in the SEARCH_VALUE) but perhaps that isn't viable at validation time.


---