You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by Tim Williams <wi...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/18 01:33:11 UTC
State of dispatcher?
Looking at our issues for 0.9 and attempting to answer recent question
about dispatcher got me poking around a bit more and trying to learn
where we're at. It's highlighted two questions:
1) Do we see dispatcher being in the 0.9 release or not (i.e. FOR-796)?
2) Where exactly is the dispatcher? There is dispatcher in the
whiteboard/plugins and a branch that appears to still be somewhat
active after a long period of time. If it is still an active branch,
whether it makes it out of the whiteboard for release or not, it needs
to be merged with trunk soon I think.
Thoughts?
--tim
RE: State of dispatcher?
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@juntadeandalucia.es>.
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 15:18 +0100, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 19:15 +1000, Gavin wrote:
> ...
> > > I will try a dry-run merge now and see what is coming out.
> >
> > Ah, this would be good, thanks Thorsten.
> >
> > To be honest I lost track of where I was supposed to be working when doing
> > dispatcher stuff, so continued with
> >
> > /trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*dispatcher
> > /trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*themes
> >
> > It would be good to have all this stuff merged, then we can look at the
> > state of the merger and decide if it can go into the release.
>
> The following release have been done in the trunk against the dispatcher
> after the creation of the branch:
I mean revisions!
> 733422
> 734387
> 734405
> 734546
> 734605
> 773472
> 795708
> 816460
> 816466
>
> The above committs have to be re-done by hand after the merge, or?
>
> I did:
> cd forrest/trunk/whiteboard
> svn merge -r 700363:HEAD
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/branches/dispatcher_rewrite
>
> I will try to merge the above revision with the trunk.
...with the merged trunk.
salu2
>
> salu2
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gav...
> >
> >
> > >
> > > salu2
> > >
> > > > --tim
> > > --
> > > Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
> > > Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>
> > >
> > > Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad
> > > de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > > Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.71/2510 - Release Date: 11/17/09
> > > 19:26:00
> >
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>
Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad
de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)
RE: State of dispatcher?
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@juntadeandalucia.es>.
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 19:15 +1000, Gavin wrote:
...
> > I will try a dry-run merge now and see what is coming out.
>
> Ah, this would be good, thanks Thorsten.
>
> To be honest I lost track of where I was supposed to be working when doing
> dispatcher stuff, so continued with
>
> /trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*dispatcher
> /trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*themes
>
> It would be good to have all this stuff merged, then we can look at the
> state of the merger and decide if it can go into the release.
The following release have been done in the trunk against the dispatcher
after the creation of the branch:
733422
734387
734405
734546
734605
773472
795708
816460
816466
The above committs have to be re-done by hand after the merge, or?
I did:
cd forrest/trunk/whiteboard
svn merge -r 700363:HEAD
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/branches/dispatcher_rewrite
I will try to merge the above revision with the trunk.
salu2
>
> Thanks
>
> Gav...
>
>
> >
> > salu2
> >
> > > --tim
> > --
> > Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
> > Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>
> >
> > Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad
> > de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.71/2510 - Release Date: 11/17/09
> > 19:26:00
>
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>
Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad
de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)
RE: State of dispatcher?
Posted by Gavin <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thorsten Scherler [mailto:thorsten.scherler.ext@juntadeandalucia.es]
> Sent: Thursday, 19 November 2009 8:37 PM
> To: dev@forrest.apache.org
> Subject: Re: State of dispatcher?
>
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 19:51 -0500, Tim Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Tim Williams <wi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> Looking at our issues for 0.9 and attempting to answer recent
> question
> > >> about dispatcher got me poking around a bit more and trying to learn
> > >> where we're at. It's highlighted two questions:
> > >>
> > >> 1) Do we see dispatcher being in the 0.9 release or not (i.e. FOR-
> 796)?
> > >>
> > >> 2) Where exactly is the dispatcher? There is dispatcher in the
> > >> whiteboard/plugins and a branch that appears to still be somewhat
> > >> active after a long period of time. If it is still an active
> branch,
> > >> whether it makes it out of the whiteboard for release or not, it
> needs
> > >> to be merged with trunk soon I think.
> > >
> > > Is the recent activity in the branch more than cleanup that may have
> > > been found by a script? That's what my cursory look made me think of.
> >
> > I don't think so. It looks to me like the branch was created over 13
> > months ago and has not yet merged back into trunk. So, from what I
> > can tell, we have 3 different dispatcher related code-sets:
> >
> > /branches/dispatcher_rewrite
>
> This branch I have created to merge the two (actually three) following
> into one plugin.
>
> > /trunk/whiteboard/dispatcher
> > /trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*dispatcher
>
> /trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*themes
>
> is missing.
>
> The branch is tested and used by my client now over 6 month. I do not
> see any problems with it anymore and further there are some bugs fixed
> that had been reported as well from Vincent ( Server returned HTTP
> response code: 503 for URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd). That
> is actually a bug in the resolver but it is fixed in the branch.
>
>
> >
> > >From what I can tell, the latest code is still in the branch. If this
> > is correct, beyond whether or not it goes into the 0.9 release, I
> > think it'd be "Really Good" if we merged it soon... the most
> > immediate concern is deciding whether it makes it into the release or
> > not though...
> >
>
> I will try a dry-run merge now and see what is coming out.
Ah, this would be good, thanks Thorsten.
To be honest I lost track of where I was supposed to be working when doing
dispatcher stuff, so continued with
/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*dispatcher
/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*themes
It would be good to have all this stuff merged, then we can look at the
state of the merger and decide if it can go into the release.
Thanks
Gav...
>
> salu2
>
> > --tim
> --
> Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
> Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>
>
> Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad
> de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.71/2510 - Release Date: 11/17/09
> 19:26:00
Re: State of dispatcher?
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@juntadeandalucia.es>.
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 19:51 -0500, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Tim Williams <wi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Looking at our issues for 0.9 and attempting to answer recent question
> >> about dispatcher got me poking around a bit more and trying to learn
> >> where we're at. It's highlighted two questions:
> >>
> >> 1) Do we see dispatcher being in the 0.9 release or not (i.e. FOR-796)?
> >>
> >> 2) Where exactly is the dispatcher? There is dispatcher in the
> >> whiteboard/plugins and a branch that appears to still be somewhat
> >> active after a long period of time. If it is still an active branch,
> >> whether it makes it out of the whiteboard for release or not, it needs
> >> to be merged with trunk soon I think.
> >
> > Is the recent activity in the branch more than cleanup that may have
> > been found by a script? That's what my cursory look made me think of.
>
> I don't think so. It looks to me like the branch was created over 13
> months ago and has not yet merged back into trunk. So, from what I
> can tell, we have 3 different dispatcher related code-sets:
>
> /branches/dispatcher_rewrite
This branch I have created to merge the two (actually three) following
into one plugin.
> /trunk/whiteboard/dispatcher
> /trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*dispatcher
/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*themes
is missing.
The branch is tested and used by my client now over 6 month. I do not
see any problems with it anymore and further there are some bugs fixed
that had been reported as well from Vincent ( Server returned HTTP
response code: 503 for URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd). That
is actually a bug in the resolver but it is fixed in the branch.
>
> >From what I can tell, the latest code is still in the branch. If this
> is correct, beyond whether or not it goes into the 0.9 release, I
> think it'd be "Really Good" if we merged it soon... the most
> immediate concern is deciding whether it makes it into the release or
> not though...
>
I will try a dry-run merge now and see what is coming out.
salu2
> --tim
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>
Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad
de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)
Re: State of dispatcher?
Posted by Tim Williams <wi...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Tim Williams <wi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looking at our issues for 0.9 and attempting to answer recent question
>> about dispatcher got me poking around a bit more and trying to learn
>> where we're at. It's highlighted two questions:
>>
>> 1) Do we see dispatcher being in the 0.9 release or not (i.e. FOR-796)?
>>
>> 2) Where exactly is the dispatcher? There is dispatcher in the
>> whiteboard/plugins and a branch that appears to still be somewhat
>> active after a long period of time. If it is still an active branch,
>> whether it makes it out of the whiteboard for release or not, it needs
>> to be merged with trunk soon I think.
>
> Is the recent activity in the branch more than cleanup that may have
> been found by a script? That's what my cursory look made me think of.
I don't think so. It looks to me like the branch was created over 13
months ago and has not yet merged back into trunk. So, from what I
can tell, we have 3 different dispatcher related code-sets:
/branches/dispatcher_rewrite
/trunk/whiteboard/dispatcher
/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/*dispatcher
>From what I can tell, the latest code is still in the branch. If this
is correct, beyond whether or not it goes into the 0.9 release, I
think it'd be "Really Good" if we merged it soon... the most
immediate concern is deciding whether it makes it into the release or
not though...
--tim
Re: State of dispatcher?
Posted by Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Tim Williams <wi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at our issues for 0.9 and attempting to answer recent question
> about dispatcher got me poking around a bit more and trying to learn
> where we're at. It's highlighted two questions:
>
> 1) Do we see dispatcher being in the 0.9 release or not (i.e. FOR-796)?
>
> 2) Where exactly is the dispatcher? There is dispatcher in the
> whiteboard/plugins and a branch that appears to still be somewhat
> active after a long period of time. If it is still an active branch,
> whether it makes it out of the whiteboard for release or not, it needs
> to be merged with trunk soon I think.
Is the recent activity in the branch more than cleanup that may have
been found by a script? That's what my cursory look made me think of.
Brian
> Thoughts?
> --tim
>