[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1690) Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88

["Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>]

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=comments#action_12421172 ] 
            
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMO-1690:
----------------------------------------

I think this is on the 1.1.1 list because of the attached patch which is already committed and so the core of the problem (1) is fixed.  I think its ok to move 2&3 our to a future release. as these I would not consider critical for 1.1.1.

> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-1690
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: deployment
>    Affects Versions: 1.1
>            Reporter: Sachin Patel
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>         Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> From an earlier dev list note...
> 1) The Target is currently discarded by our JSR-88 code because the
> Deployer GBean does not accept a Target/ConfigStore as an argument. 
> That needs to be changed, but it should be pretty straightforward.
> 2) I think the Target name is the full ObjectName of the ConfigStore,
> which means it would be pretty heinous to type on the command line. 
> Hopefully we can make it just the name= component of the ObjectName or
> something like that, but that would require some thought about what to
> do in case of non-unique names.
> 3) I don't think the Hot Deploy Dir GBean lets you specify a Target,
> and it probably should take that as a config param.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira