You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@jakarta.apache.org by Martin Cooper <mf...@gmail.com> on 2005/07/02 20:33:27 UTC

Re: mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> 
> > 4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the
> > j-c guidelines saying that each package has its own mailing list.  If
> > that is intentional, I think that is a *bad* idea, especially to start.
> 
> it was intentional in as much as it was a copy of the jakarta commons
> charter :)
> 
> > Don't like the many little lists implied by 11 -- dev + user works fine
> > in j-c (I know some disagree, but I personally view this as the key to
> > the health of j-c)
> 
> i agree. just dev and user lists.
> 
> in jakarta commons, the common mailing lists hold together the single
> community. i'd like to see just one mailing list with components using
> prefixing (as per jakarta commons). i'd like to see changes to the draft
> so that it's clear that this will be the arrangement.
> 
> opinions?

+1 to just one dev and one user list, shared for all components, a la
Jakarta Commons.

--
Martin Cooper


> - robert
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

Posted by Felipe Leme <ja...@felipeal.net>.
Martin Cooper wrote:

> +1 to just one dev and one user list, shared for all components, a la
> Jakarta Commons.

Me too...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:33 -0400, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > 
> > > 4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the
> > > j-c guidelines saying that each package has its own mailing list.  If
> > > that is intentional, I think that is a *bad* idea, especially to start.
> > 
> > it was intentional in as much as it was a copy of the jakarta commons
> > charter :)
> > 
> > > Don't like the many little lists implied by 11 -- dev + user works fine
> > > in j-c (I know some disagree, but I personally view this as the key to
> > > the health of j-c)
> > 
> > i agree. just dev and user lists.
> > 
> > in jakarta commons, the common mailing lists hold together the single
> > community. i'd like to see just one mailing list with components using
> > prefixing (as per jakarta commons). i'd like to see changes to the draft
> > so that it's clear that this will be the arrangement.
> > 
> > opinions?
> 
> +1 to just one dev and one user list, shared for all components, a la
> Jakarta Commons.

i think we've established a consensus on this. any objections to
amending the draft appropriately? 

- robert


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org