AW: AW: Copy files according ant property

[Ja...@rzf.fin-nrw.de]

Have you migrated now, Steve? ;-)
Main idea is that <copy> does the copy stuff. Why should we have a <copydir> <copyfile> <copypath> <copyresource> <copyWhatTheHellElse> ?

Jan 

>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:stevel@apache.org] 
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. September 2005 17:57
>An: Ant Users List
>Betreff: Re: AW: Copy files according ant property
>
>Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
>> Sure - it´s not in 1.6.5.
>> <copypath> is in svn head and maybe in 1.7 - but I think we will 
>> delete that task, especially because <copy> itself should now handle 
>> nested <path>s, because paths are ResourceCollections. And Stefan 
>> added that just yesterday :-)
>> 
>
>hey, I use copypath.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For 
>additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org