You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Hudson (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/03/07 19:53:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28359) Improve quota RateLimiter synchronization
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824520#comment-17824520 ]
Hudson commented on HBASE-28359:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2
[build #1006 on builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1006/]: (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1006/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1006/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1006/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1006/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> Improve quota RateLimiter synchronization
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-28359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28359
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Bryan Beaudreault
> Assignee: Ray Mattingly
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 2.6.0, 3.0.0-beta-2
>
>
> We've been experiencing RpcThrottlingException with 0ms waitInterval. This seems odd and wasteful, since the client side will immediately retry without backoff. I think the problem is related to the synchronization of RateLimiter.
> The TimeBasedLimiter checkQuota method does the following:
> {code:java}
> if (!reqSizeLimiter.canExecute(estimateWriteSize + estimateReadSize)) {
> RpcThrottlingException.throwRequestSizeExceeded(
> reqSizeLimiter.waitInterval(estimateWriteSize + estimateReadSize));
> } {code}
> Both canExecute and waitInterval are synchronized, but we're calling them independently. So it's possible under high concurrency for canExecute to return false, but then waitInterval returns 0 (would have been true)
> I think we should simplify the API to have a single synchronized call:
> {code:java}
> long waitInterval = reqSizeLimiter.tryAcquire(estimateWriteSize + estimateReadSize);
> if (waitInterval > 0) {
> RpcThrottlingException.throwRequestSizeExceeded(waitInterval);
> }{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)