You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@zeppelin.apache.org by "duncan.folkes@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com> on 2016/11/21 21:40:51 UTC

Re: Pass parameters to paragraphs via URL


On 2016-07-13 16:34 (-0000), TEJA SRIVASTAV <te...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> PS typo
> <div ng-init="z.angularBind('params',getLocationParams,'ourParagraphId')
> "></div>
> <div ng-init="z.angularBind('params',getLocationParams(),'ourParagraphId')
> "></div>
> 
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:03 PM TEJA SRIVASTAV <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > We do have work around for that but Validate.
> > You need to use angularBinding to achieve it
> > %angular
> > <script>
> > var
> > scope=angular.element(document.getElementById("main")).scope().$root.compiledScope;
> > scope.getLocationParams = function(){
> > var pairs = window.location.search.substring(1).split("&"),
> >     obj = {},
> >
> >     pair,
> >     i;
> >
> >   for ( i in pairs ) {
> >     if ( pairs[i] === "" ) continue;
> >
> >     pair = pairs[i].split("=");
> >     obj[ decodeURIComponent( pair[0] ) ] = decodeURIComponent( pair[1] );
> >   }
> >
> >   return obj;
> >
> > </script>
> > <div ng-init="z.angularBind('params',getLocationParams,'ourParagraphId')
> > "></div>
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:02 PM Rajesh Balamohan <
> > rajesh.balamohan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 on this.  I am not sure if this is possible. If so, it would be really
> >> helpful.
> >>
> >> ~Rajesh.B
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:33 PM, on <sc...@web.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to pass parameters via URL to a published paragraph (and to
> >>> run it after that), e.g., I would like to get variable test of
> >>> /paragraph/20160708-144835_1515469620?asIframe&test=123 within my python
> >>> context, calculating a bit and then printing the result in the paragraph
> >>> (so that it appears on the website).
> >>>
> >>> Is this even possible?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and best regards,
> >>> ON
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ~Rajesh.B
> >>
Sorry to resurrect this thread, but the above solution no longer works (subsequent to the changes in 0.6?) . I've been digging around a fair amount but don't yet have a working solution - anyone got this working with \u22650.6?