You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/11/30 15:16:50 UTC

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3641) NamedUPCredentialLoginModule vs ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3641.
-----------------------------------------

    Resolution: Invalid

> NamedUPCredentialLoginModule vs ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-3641
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3641
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
>
> I see that ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule and NamedUPCredentialLoginModule are added to geronimo codebase around the same time (rev 159325 and rev 159560).  The difference between the two is that NamedUPCredentialLoginModule uses the user supplied username and password where as ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule gets the username and password from options supplied to the login module.  NamedUPCredentialLoginModule is used by the Security realms portlet whereas there are no references to ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule in the codebase.  I guess one of them (most likely ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule) is redundant and it should be eliminated.  What am I missing?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.